No. Im saying there is an army of people like him and this will just make it harder to combat them. Whether or not you or I like it, toney and people like him will actually have something to point to. Its like givig ammo to your enemy when you are at your weakest (aka pissing off many people who have powered up and paid in blood sweat and tears for it.

As for who your investors are, your definition and the market's may not be the same. I hope for the stake of all steemit and those working hard on it yours is the correct perception. I think its wrong though. Piss off the community enough and see what happens. This isnt a threat. Ive simply seen it all before.

Break the contract once. Breaking trust once is all it takes. I dont care who says otherwise...this is not how it will belooked at.

Final point. What happens if, after another 6 months steemit needs to completely change what makes it steem again? How many big changes will it survive without a large community sharig the weight and believing in the vision?

I dont have a dog in this fight. I have only beem there since day 4 of PTS and right on the field for every piece of history that gives me a background and opinion that should carry some weight.

This, to me, is making the same kinds of mistakes we did in the past. Changing the foundation of steem should be a last resort. Are we at the point of last resorts?