RE: HF20 Update: Operations Stable
I agree, but that's common sense. Logic.
However, my brain can't comprehend the last few words you just typed out, I kinda exploded, but that's more because of the accusation you put in between the lines.
If your own brain capacity is limited by that much intelligence, i understand that you can't process the idea that good content is mandatory on this platform and worth so much more than "nothing". The ideology here is that the community decides how much it will be rewarded. There is a chance you earn nothing, but is earning the focus? Is creating good content the focus? Is curating shit posts for a higher CR the focus? You tell me.
Please, before making it sound like you're superior by implying that other people who do not agree with you are incompetent: Get a better understanding about the (revolutionary) concept of steem and get out of your litter first.
Good content is mandatory, that doesn't mean bad content should be banned.
The focus should be allowing people to use the system the way they would use it.
Earning rewards for other peoples posts because you referred them to the platform would make it questionable in my opinion, very very questionable.
I believe I stated that plainly.
I do not imply that disagreeing with me is incompetant, it is my opinion that money based referral systems are super dodgy and trusting anything to do with one is incompetent, that's all.
It's ok to disagree with me, there's nothing to be afraid of.
"Good" versus "Bad" is just an opinion, so what are you trying to say and what do you mean with content getting banned? If that is happening right now I'm sorry because I didn't know, but that I find really hard to believe unless you mean flags.
They can use the system? If you need RC tokens to publish, you can try to gather them by engaging with other Steemians or post something valuable on our blockchain. The more you contribute, the higher the chance of getting rewarded. Ah, the "more" thing is limited eh? Well, simply use Proof of Brain a little bit more and comment a little bit more than "Nice Post", the platform is already full with shitposts, and do we want to have more of that? I don't. If your RC tokens are scarce, what would you do? I would spend them wisely. You shouldn't be asking for more, because you think you are entitled to. That's simply not how the system works.
Getting rewards simply because you referred authors are ridiculous.
k.
I fail to see where I said that steem currently bans bad content. I said good content is mandatory but that doesn't mean bad content should be banned.
You're putting words in my mouth.
Engagement requires RC. Your point is completely moot.
Contributing more is impossible if your RC is limiting you.
There's no such thing as proof of brain. People should really stop throwing that phrase from the whitepaper around, its silly.
You're saying that saying more than 'nice post' solves the problem completely. I know for a fact there are thousands of frustrated small users who disagree with you.
Scarce RC would destroy steems credibility.
Imagining that use of a social network is entitlement is the kind of thinking that kills steem.
To say that's simply not how the system works is moot too, the system worked before HF19 and resources has never been scarce, nor should RC be.
Actually you are wrong, the social network that will eventually manifest and take everything's place will reward people for every conceivable activity, and no amount of small-mindedness will stand in the way of progress.
We have to decide if steem will be the social network everyone adopts or just a way for the already invested to milk something out till it dies.
K.
Here is an imaginary dick you can chew on.
Leaves this shallow-minded one-way discussion.
you are the weakest link, goodbye.