RE: @thesloth @thedumpster @thedelegator @steemservices @danknugs @nextgencrypto @berniesanders You can't flag me if I don't post anymore
At least you discovered that centralization is more efficient.
Preminers, or not, the founders and creators deserve a lion share of their creation, and this is what their vests are.
It pays tiny bits, and it certainly does not pay off to start a free account from scratch without importing loyal previous outside followers and/or risking/investing in the system by buying into it with cash.
For big outsiders coming in, it provides a decent way to increase both their income and their exposure, and these are good for the system.
It would not have been fare if these little spammers whom invest nothing and in fact ruin the system were rewarded as much as the founders and investors.
Calibrae, if it ever begins to function, would have both big disadvantages and advantages over steemit.
One of your initial claims about calibrae was that it will delete preminers and their big benefactors, and later you removed this stipulation after it was discovered, and it really is not this hard to discover, under Steemit's transparency, that your own accounts should be deleted from calibrae by the spirit of your own claims.
Then you removed this stipulation, and made a good step by deciding on a start from a scratch to all, which may be good.
The nature of such blockchains with info only being added over time with no possibility do delete junk is one of its biggest downfalls.
The vast majority of content in Steemit is junk and spam, and it really is a free platform, in the sense that it has no censorship, and is quite decentralized and anarchistic despite your claims, and these will bring to its demise.
Instead of you, I would have powered down and invested at something else.
Calibrae is atrociously flawed, and I already stated some of its flaws in your first thread about it.
You decided to correct one of those flaws, but added new flaws to it, like coerced automatic upvoting and downvoting in cases of follow and mute respectively.
This is so bad and I tried to explain to you where I first saw it.
I believe a blockchain should have some possibility for a large enough majority of miners/witnesses/shareholders to completely delete entities off the blockchain to free the space they wasted, and to at least temporarily spare the future waste of both bandwidth and space they would have wasted otherwise.
They should also have the possibility of muting (not hiding) without deletion.
How did you manage to open 3 separate accounts in here?
3 different phone numbers?
Or are 3 distinct emails enough?
You could have found those two things out if you weren't more concerned about spamming the chain with ignorant baseless attempts to discredit yourself.
Where did I spam the chain with ignorant baseless attempts to discredit myself?
You used it in plural form, so 2 examples would suffice, but I will be glad to get more than 2 examples for your claim.
You just simply did. But no words can be heard by deaf ears. The ignorant are the most confident in their knowledge.
Someone should call blacklist-a
Founders and creators deserve a lion's share? Perhaps Satoshi Nakamoto should have premined most of bitcoin? Notably, the opposite happened there - Satoshi's bitcoin lies dormant. Steemit's creators deserve something for their efforts but once they succeed at making a popular platform, their creation and the value created by that critical mass of users had better have the capacity to become greater than that of any small clique within it. Otherwise the userbase is on borrowed time while the orchestrators finalise their exit strategy.
Satoshi's bitcoin lies dormant (he never sold any?), and so is most of dan's and ned's STEEM.
The difference is that Bitcoin will rise over time, and STEEM may probably never exceed 1.9$, and IMO is goind to descend.
The difference on Steem is also that high-SP self-voters (and their flocks of sycophants) circle-jerk rewards to themselves. The people at the top of this dung-heap are still going to get (a substantial) something out of this dodgy endeavour even as it all falls down. That's the point of an exit strategy.
There are much fewer accounts than you think that do not deserve their SP: they either premined it (founders), mined it (invested real assets, energy and cash in the system and allow it to work), bought it with their own cash, or earned it (only in this case there may be undeserving exceptions, and still some of these deserve it).
Since STEEM is a shitcoin (unlimited amount) , there has to be interest rate on it, and even then I heard it still does not completely cover the cost of its inflation.