You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: @Dan, when you enrich this platform with your content, please would you consider accepting the rewards you earn?
It is not about whether Dan is adding value, but it is more a matter of how the community's limited rewards pool is allocated. Dan already has millions of dollars of STEEM. The view of a lot of people in the community is that he does not really need to grow his stake even more. If we use our resources to add to his stake, then that is less to incentivize new users to contribute and other members to put time and effort in to grow the platform.
Dan is heavily vested in the platform, so it is not like the things he does to add value go unrewarded. He will get a better return on his investment if he adds value to this platform, and the price of STEEM goes up.
I understand this point very well @timcliff but thank you for adding it as a comment. I would rather dan was rewarded even more than some of the authors presently making use of the reward pool, just my opinion.
Well I agree with the sentiment behind your thought, but in my view I think that means we need to do a better job recruiting more talented content creators, and do better at rewarding the undervalued ones that are already here producing great content.
Well obviously I agree with this :)