You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Revisiting Curation Reward: Hot Coffee, Cold Coffee, and Lukewarm Coffee
Great post! It is definitely worth considering. I like the idea and would be in support of it.
The main arguments against it are going to be that we are paying people to do nothing, and there is a psychological disincentive to voting. Both could be argued to be bad for the platform.
As far as paying people to do nothing - personally I believe that having people who are only interested in making a profit not voting is adding value to the platform.
@smooth also brought up a great in regards to this type of plan which would be that the financial incentive is slightly higher than linear - so that there is actually a small incentive for users to keep their SP powered up under a single account vs. splitting it into multiple smaller accounts.
Wasn't my idea. Dan suggested it might be added later when the original incentive to not split up accounts (higher curation rewards) was removed.
Ah, ok. Thanks.