You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal

in #steem • 6 years ago (edited)

No need to ask Steemit, stop worshiping them.

  1. Linear curve is not flawed
  2. Very fast but what curve you want?
  3. You'll get to downvote for free very soon, so if you upvote yourself in excess on stupid content you'l most likely get downvoted.
  4. Can shower yourself in virtue signaling.
  5. Estimates on what? Your bogus claim?
  6. Calculate that yourself if you think it's relevant.
  7. It's not flawed and it was approved by witness voted by all stakeholders.
  8. "Where did explain why it weren't flawed anymore before" WTF?
  9. Because it's his only contribution to Steem this last year beside self-voting with his huge stake.

Read the downvote section again. I like to think it's mostly my suggestion and I'm not bragging about it because it's so obviously the solution to people buying votes on half baked comments like this one.

6 years ago in #steem by
$0.45
  • Past Payouts $0.45
  • - Author $0.44
  • - Curators $0.01
4 votes
Reply 7
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited)
    3. Think that is a bad thing. Using your stake to upvote your own comments on your own posts allows you to be an ass without disrupting the content economy, but doing so will get you flagged. Running a bid bot that upvotes crap posts will allow you to be an even worse ass because for you it is just like self voting as effectively all the money flows back to you with current ROI at about 100% for bot users, but while doing so, you will be disrupting both the trending pages and the reputation system. Measures that drive stake holders from being an ass in their own little content bubble towards being an ass in a way that disrupts core features of the platform isn't improvement IMHO.

    Have a look at this poll, seems by the votes to far, I think all these options need to truly be carefully considered before implementing measures that make passive stake holders move to even more disruptive use of their stake.

    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02
    • - Author $0.02
    • - Curators $0.01
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    What are you alluding to? My comment is super critical of Steemit.

    No need to ask Steemit, stop worshiping them.

    2. How fast? Where did you get that information?
    4. That's like poetry but I don't get what you mean.
    5. Estimate on the piece of the pie control by those who upvote themselves the most and at which rate this is increasing?
    6. I've made estimate in the past. My question was mostly rhetorical.
    7. We do agree that it was voted by at least 15 witnesses.
    8. Where did Steemit explain why linear rewards weren't flawed anymore, before implementing them?
      Steemit Inc said linear rewards were flawed. They then supported linear rewards while never explaining why they weren't flawed, "anymore".
    [-]
     6 years ago 

    What's your goal to shame steemit retroactively?

    $0.04
    • Past Payouts $0.04
    • - Author $0.03
    • - Curators $0.01
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     6 years ago 

    I've been talking against linear reward since at least november 2017. I want a change as soon as possible to something nit fundamentally flawed.

    [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    You heard the man @teamsteem. Good old transistoRadio wants you to stop asking questions that make sense because it is "embarrassing" for him. Thank you for not saying the truth out loud in advance. Transisto Radio appreciates your silence. XD