Sort:  

Wait, so your argument is that the community is in charge of moderating the reward structure based on how everyone sees fit to distribute their upvotes.

And that if the community feels he has too much of the reward pool they will downvote him.

Yet 99.9% of the downvotes come from Bernie and his army of bots.
Which is only representative of a tiny fraction of the sentiment of the community.

So wait... logic?

Stake based. meaning every person's influence in the community is based on their stake. I can't decide if you guys are all purposely being obtuse. If not.. I don't even know what to say.