RE: Steem Basic Income - More Awesome Contests
The 28 upvote target is based on regular upvotes on daily updates. I looked into relative targets (based on % of actual updates upvoted) instead of absolute targets. The factor that you're not considering is the maintenance load. For the same effort required to continuously adjust relative targets instead of absolute targets, I can publish the daily updates and it becomes a moot point- since upvoting only the daily updates is sufficient if we are actually publishing them every day.
The target is 28 full upvotes, and there is currently no benefit to upvoting in excess of that. While your concerns arise from the number of upvotes you have given on comments which did not actually pay out, you were not actually rewarded for most of those upvotes under the current system. You have 99 full upvotes in the last month, and only 28 of those contributed to your bonus.
The whole reward system for upvotes will be revamped when we finish our fully automated system. At that point, we will be looking at % of rshares actually paid out, so any dusted upvotes will not be captured.
I'm not actually suggesting relative targets, maintaining that would just be annoying.
I have to admit, I never checked the amount of upvotes I have given out. Just a plain and simple "the more the merrier" approach to get up to the 28 upvotes and to stay there.
Also from those 99 upvotes, I'm pretty sure only the upvotes on posts and some comments (infact I received curation on some comments) paid out. More than those 28 I hope, but way less than 99.
But I don't mind, steembasicincome is giving me way more right now than I possibly can give back.
For the conclusion part, it could be possible, that the problem with the upvotes on comments has a way smaller impact than I'm thinking it has.
The whole dust threshold just showed me how useless my upvotes were for steembasicincome, but receiving bonus shares the same time. Putting my behaviour on everybody else was an exaggeration.
Pushing out the automation (and with that the solution to the dust votes) instead of trying to fix a working system should be the better option right now. 👍
We do appreciate your feedback. In the meantime, I have started checking our comments every couple of days and any comment with dust votes is upvoted just enough to exceed the threshold. It uses a tiny portion of voting power and helps prevent upvotes from our members from being wasted.
That is a way better solution. Nothing is wasted and I don't mind the self upvoting from sbi, it is necessary to maintain the levels and to increase the sustainability. 👍
Can't wait for the automation though. 😁
That makes two of us! but we just brought in another developer, so that should help.