Hi! Sorry for interfering in a discussion that really doesn't concern me: I don't really know @nadiaturrina, although I've read quite a few of her posts. So I don't like to defend her or condemn her. But...: what did she actually do that was bad? The demand for unquestionable disclosure and verification of one's identity is a typical sovereign right, as held by the police or a court. In my opinion, it has no place on a decentralised and free platform. There is no law and no regulation that you have to appear and reveal yourself here exclusively with your real name. That is also a good thing! Unfortunately, this seems to have been forgotten a little. More and more Communities insist on such a procedure. Does this effectively prevent abuse? I don't know. The fact is that it creates a general mood of mistrust which I find very off-putting. So do many, many other Steemians who don't post in communities because of this. Is it worth it...?

What @nadiaturrina does with her own account and stake, whether she justifies it or not, is her sole decision. The community account she manages is a different story: here she has acted in a quasi-fiduciary capacity and would do well to hand over control of the account. Personally, I have no reason to doubt that she will do so. At the moment, there is a lot of dirty laundry being washed and beaten up on her from all sides - I would also crawl into a hole and wait until all this is over...

As you wrote yourself: wait a few days and see if she reacts rationally and honestly hands over her responsibilities to you. I am optimistic.