As long as we're being pedantic, it's not so much false as it is ambiguous. It would have been false if they had said "most transactions in the history of the world."
If Ethereum were to spike in price tomorrow and Bitcoin dropped such that Ethereum had top market cap, but did not surpass Bitcoin's all time high, would Ethereum not rejoice in being number one?
It's false if the implication is that it was the most transactions ever to take place in a 24 hour window, but not if it was simply recognizing the status of currently being in the lead.
As long as we're being pedantic, it's not so much false as it is ambiguous. It would have been false if they had said "most transactions in the history of the world."
If Ethereum were to spike in price tomorrow and Bitcoin dropped such that Ethereum had top market cap, but did not surpass Bitcoin's all time high, would Ethereum not rejoice in being number one?
not really :D
lmao!
Come up with some original meme, damn I see the same crap everywhere.
We're [temporarily] number one! :-P
Hey!
It's false if the implication is that it was the most transactions ever to take place in a 24 hour window, but not if it was simply recognizing the status of currently being in the lead.