Sort:  

Of course, it's good to take a look at stuff like this to see if it is abusive.

Of course, and no one prevented it. The system is censorship-resistant, and anyone can post whatever they want. Others can vote as they see fit. The system works and is working, but we can still disagree on whether your method of demonizing people and attempting to label using their use of their SP and their votes as they see fit as 'fraudulent' or 'abuse' is a positive and way forward for the community. I don't believe it is.

If it ends up being plagiarism or other form of abuse (as was the case for @msgivings) then by all means, present the evidence of that. Leave build the attempts to build a case on the basis of guilt by association.

Can/will you tell me about the inactive whalestake?
Specifically, is that stake a threat to emerge unannounced?
Will it hang over our heads for years to come?