You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What NEEDS to change NOW in order for Steemit to Survive. (Partial Payout Declined Self-Voting)
What will happen with a 100% vote is everyone would vote once for them selves every 6 days and the platform would be completely dead.
I disagree because curation rewards can be worth several times what a self-upvote is worth.
Why not let people who want to patronize others do that, let people who want to self-promote do that (but with a lot less spam), and let investors who do not want to participate in the social media aspect do that without suffering inflation penalties?
I detail more of my thought in this post.
https://steemit.com/steem-ideas/@donaldtrumpfan/allow-a-100-sp-vote-the-best-voting-problem-solution
Also, look at the current content. It is already 90% self-promoted trash. For the rare contribution that is worth up-voting, I would rather give much more than 2%.