The @nobidbot account is SO much bigger than any single individual, it must be run by the community!

in #steemit6 years ago (edited)

I am pleased to re-announce, what we already knew, and that is, the @nobidbot account is SO much bigger than any single individual, it must be run by the community!

In order for the #nobidbot tag as well as the @nobidbot account to rise to their fullest potentials, I very much believe as does @whatamidoing, that these entities truly need to be a community asset.

I had created this account to further what had been started by @transparencybot, which was quickly followed by the introduction of the #nobidbot tag via @whatamidoing.

As many may know, my creation of this account did lead to some discussions that revealed to many the importance of having these assets held as much as possible by multiple members of the community.

BTW: I love discussions and feedback, they are essential to creating products that excel and community support. I just would rather not to use discord. I simply prefer to keep EVERY thing as open and transparent as possible. Even battle plans with your worst nemesis are so much better off being fully transparent. How many wars could be prevented if all generals disused all battle plans 100% of the time? I know this is a fairy tale, but sometimes we simply "ought" to do things they way they "ought" to be done.

Transparency works even when things get complicated. If you are interested, here is a recent example of how I employed this conecpt.

First step to making sure this account was held as much as possible by the community and no single individual.

I have turned over both the posting and active keys to @whatamidoing so he can begin using the account immediately.

Step 2

Is a bit more complicated.

It is my desire to turn over the owner key of this account to at least two individuals that have demonstrated both a solid commitment to the long term health of the platform as well as having earned my respect by demonstrating the qualities of integrity, honesty and transparency.

The recipient of this key may share it with anyone else they believe also holds these same qualities.

Once this key has been turned over they will.

  1. Change the owner password. This will remove me entirely from any ownership in this entity.
  2. Share the new active and posting keys with @whatamidoing and his team, so they can continue their work.
  3. Share the owner key with at least one other individual not directly connected with this account.
  4. Promise to loosely oversee the account as required to ensure the account is being maintained in a manner that they deem to be an asset to the community.

I do hope someone will step up and take this challenge.

Here is my current short list of those I would like to give this key to: (In no particular order).

@gtg
@lukestokes
@gems.and.cookies
@tarazkp
@curie (Providing this does not cause any type of curation conflict.)
@patrice
@beanz
@carlgnash

There are many others that I have been fortunate enough to have met that share these same qualities, but I do have to start somewhere with a list, so these 8 have been put forward.

If any of the above candidates would be willing to take on this responsibility, please let me know and if you would, let me know in few short words why?

I believe this method of turning over the account will both help grow this movement as well as provide long term security for this community asset.


One last thing --- Thank you all; those who are working so hard, to help bring quality back to Steemit!!

Blessing to all!

Craig

Sort:  

Hopefully it works out. Could you have a team of manual curators and just have the bot boost their vote? Perhaps you could get the community to apply and get like 100 curators and have the bot do 1% upvotes after them.

I believe @whatamidoing wants to form a team for manual curation, you might want to get with him on this.

Thanks. I followed him.

Great decision and you really giving the value to transperancy and it's really great because transperancy can lead towards the credibility and people can trust you because, the work is like open book. And yes we all should strive hard to bring back quality to this platform. Thanks for sharing and wishing you an great day. Stay blessed. 🙂

Thank you, these are kind words, I appreciate them.

Yes, this platform relies on quality for long term survival. Honest and OPEN discussions are the key here as they are everywhere.

Welcome and i really agree with your words. Keep doing this great work.

You guys heard of busy.org? It shows how much people have voted, especially the bid bots.

It is all transparent already, everyones wallets are transparent, each transaction.

Everything is transparent and we can evaluate everything and there are many tools which can deeply showcase analysis aspects and one example is "STEEMREPORTS". 🙂

Steemworld.org is aesome for all kinds of info also

Thank you so much for your kind reference. 🙂

There is transparency, for this we do not need this ugly spam comment bot, where he want take profit from.

@resteem.bot

Your very generous and I hope good things come of your actions. I hope these good things also come back to you.

I found one today using the tag and sending to s-steem too - manual curation (and a wallet check) will be required.

Also, the curator would need to wait 3.5 days so the post could not be voted on 'late' by many of the bots (but not all).


Are you on discord or steemit chat to discuss the sql server linked server to steemsql issue? I think DM would be the best approach to try and solve this.

I'm not actually involved in the @nobidbot account anymore. @whatamidoing is handling it.

I am still doing two different types of random upvotes with @transparencybot and @botreporter.

The random upvote for the #nobidbot tag by @transparencybot waits 24 hours, they could later use a bot.
The random upvote by @botreporter looks at their last 30 days and they are filtered out if they used them.

I never got back to look at the SQL server link. Possibly just need to use transact sql instead of SSMS to create it.

I'm rarely on discord, sorry, but if you like, send me a #secure memo with your email.

Thanks for your support.

Blessings.

@bycoleman you were flagged by a worthless gang of trolls, so, I gave you an upvote to counteract it! Enjoy!!

post a very remarkable i'm very happy to see his friends. friend help me if a time

Congratulations @bycoleman! You received a personal award!

1 Year on Steemit

Click here to view your Board of Honor

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

@bycoleman you were flagged by a worthless gang of trolls, so, I gave you an upvote to counteract it! Enjoy!!

Congratulations @bycoleman! You have completed the following achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
SteemitBoard World Cup Contest - Round of 16 - Day 4


Participate in the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @good-karma and @lukestokes


Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Can you recreate this post?
If you can automate it so i can autovote it so much the better.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitgeek/payout-stats-report-for-28th-november-2017--part-i

I liked watching the largest accounts losing influence.
It wouldnt have to be daily, weekly works for me.

It's a great list. I have bookmarked it.
I'm still working on internal changes, so it will be a while before I can work on it. Stay tuned.

I couldnt figure out why your comment didnt show in my feed, but then i remembered skeptics didnt either.
He was -8 but worked his way back up.

Good thing i caught it on steemworld.
Been hearing folks say they miss you in discord.

Yea, this -7 suits me just fine for the moment.

Glad to hear we are missed. We need to find a way to get some major supporters on board. tI really does not matter what transparencybots rep is, but is does matter if others are bullied and then afraid to support the movement. This above all needs to be addressed.

Yeah, i was disappointed at them going off the deep end.
Their ads are spam to me.

@bycoleman, I am glad to so something happening with this, even if it seems to be causing a bit of a stir among some?

I'm starting to use the #nobidbot tag, and I really hope it can be developed — somehow — into a version of the "Trending" and "Hot" feeds as they would appear if they got their places organically.

Of your shortlist, I hope @patrice picks this one up just because of her experience and resources in handling spam and scams already; @carlgnash would also be awesome, given his commitment to manual curation.

Anyway, two paws up!
=^..^=

Thank you my friend, it has been a workout.

So far no one has accepted the offer, I do believe it is a bit of a hot potato at the moment, so I had a feeling this would be the reaction.

Let's just keep on putting quality first!