You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Fixing a Problem in the Economics of Steemit
- 5% goes to a development/marketing/projects fund
So, a treasury, like Dash. If this were implemented, I don't think it's a good idea to just hand it directly over to Steemit, Inc. I think it'd be better to just allocate it to witnesses so they can approve worker projects, similar to how BitShares does it.
yes, while I think ongoing support of the development team is crucial as it confers some of the benefits of a centralized development team (efficiency, power, resources) with a decentralized currency, I think having a separate fund for individual community projects is still viable.
Honestly using the 15% anywhere else or even reducing inflation by 15% would be better than where it's at right now
I totally agree. Centralization goes 100% against freedom and everything that is right in this world.
Well, there are cases for centralization in certain situations. But I get your meaning.