You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steemit – We Need To Talk

in #steemit7 years ago

I actually looked at some of your comments after writing that.

I wanted to apologize for taking your one comment out of context when you had clearly made more and were clearly more understanding of the issue than that single comment made me feel at the time.

I think it will go away... for this issue lol.

Who knows what is next lol

As far as 3.5 days I still feel this it's a matter of choice. The choice of the person bidding.

I'm now paying attention to @abusereports, they are showing all votes on day 6. I've vowed to look at any votes coming from my bot on sixth day to determine if they are spamming/scamming or not.

If they are abusive ill be removing their vote, if not then ill let them be. So far there have only been 2. Both ok

We'll find resolve here I know it!

Sort:  

Thanks I really appreciate this! I can see where you took my comment out of context. No harm done!

I've been watching the @abusereports posts myself and don't see a whole lot of activity coming from @sneaky-ninja but I have seen abusers voting early. This really helps them blend in with the crowd. If I run into these users I'll be sure to point them out to you.

All of this brings a lot of attention to the sixth day and it's not the only day that abuser takes place.

I'm sure that it'll get figured out as well, I just don't want more innocent authors getting flagged.

Yea, not much activity there from ninja.

It's good that someone else is noticing my point about abusers just starting earlier.

I will really appreciate you pointing out abusers that you do see using my bot. (not asking you to waste your time looking, but if you do see any I can get rid of them.) So far my blacklist is only the worst abusers, not the copy pasta for example.

I am working on helping some of the innocents that have been flagged also.