You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How Steemit can save millions of lives?
Er... No. My thread has evidence and makes some accusations. It's the opponent's job to correct me. That's how these things work. You don't see somebody go onto a news panel and start telling people how their own argument is wrong, do you?
From the endless research I've already done, I know I'm right. It's your job to do better than me, and show me what you're talking about. Then I can further show you in greater detail how you are wrong.
This is how debate happens. You know that, right?
What evidence Snopes? Laughable. No you're not worth debating and you are wrong. You already made up your mind and that's fine but you shouldn't pretend you are looking for the truth because you are clearly not. End of story.
It is not the opponent's 'job' to refute baseless assertions.
Apparently, it is you who do not understand how debate happens.
I seriously doubt that your 'research' has been endless. This, I understand, appears to be an Appeal to incredulity on my part, but 'endless' implies that you have had forever in the making of your conclusion, you have not, unless you have immortality and have already lived to the end of time. Ceaseless, maybe, but if so, you have done so without actually stumbling over the facts.
Please try harder. The Classical Trivium and Quadrivium can help. Please beware of the authoritarian manipulations of the Trivium such as the Neo-Platonists and the Prussian school.