You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Dangers of Releasing a Product (Steemit) to the Public in Beta - Being compared to Hitler

in #steemit8 years ago

I agree with everything you said about it in this post. I only hope you'll find the article less upsetting by thinking of it as Steemit's own growing pains.

I remember having a shocked reaction when I heard that "friends" might be added as a feature. I had a little tantrum and then realized that of course many features will be added and many changes made. I remember a member getting really frustrated because they'd been in early and had been sharing non-original content with no problems and then suddenly it was being policed aggressively by angry newcomers and this person felt like they'd done nothing wrong. It was a heated situation. The "Dan Needs to Be Stopped" article reminds me of it because the insistence on keeping things a certain way seems too attached to something that is simply going to continue to change.

So, while I'm glad you called it out, I hope you'll not take it to seriously. People get attached. It's a good thing. :)

Sort:  

theres a big difference btw a change in content policy and "changing the matrix" to make certain peoples votes not count. Implementing a policy of "dan gets to decide who can vote and who can't" is not the same as a tweak or adding a feature.

I actually don't agree with the GitHub commit implementation and think the comments there hit the nail on the head. We'll see how Dan reacts to this whole negative backlash from it, but my point was lets not call him Hitler for suggesting it.

Good point on how it does show the commitment and attachment users have to the platform. Also, I am by no means innocent of ever having an emotional response too. But I guess it was the Hitler imagery that provoked me to post this...

If this is you provoked, I think we're all very safe. :)

How dare you sir! I would have you know that I can be quite ferocious! =P