You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The YouTube Ρurge Is In Full Swing: Ρress For Τruth's Dan Dicks Receives Strike And Is Censored

in #steemit7 years ago

censorship

i have proven all you say as to be lies, your links to evidence only end up proving you wrong yet you keep repeting the same lies over and over as if someone is going to believe you.

I am done replying to you , have fun writing 50 million more books parroting the same lies over and over and filling my comment feed for a couple days like you do every time you see me talking to someone on steemit.

smfh

Sort:  

How was it Suppressive when you posted gay porn in spite of people Suppressing you? It's either Suppressive or it's not. You haven't proven all I say to be lies at all, you've only made a vacuous claim.

Here is some of your gay spam
https://steemit.com/newslink/@beerbot/newslink-nothing-what-will-remain-uniquely-human-in-an-age-of-ai#@skeptic/re-beerbot-newslink-nothing-what-will-remain-uniquely-human-in-an-age-of-ai-20170202t050148174z

Censored and Suppressed of course.

This is the post where you specifically said GAY PORN and detailed how you will "DEFEND" by threatening people to comply with your demands that they made you do.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@skeptic/steemit-self-defence-meme-2
#TIMOM #definitations

So then, am I Lying, or are you lying about me lying? It can't be both ways now can it? The point is that you have no sense of specificity and context, more than that why would I expect someone that reasons Threats as "they made me do it" to understand the subtle difference between Suppression and Curation.

How Suppressive is it really if people can say what they want where and when they want as much as it's humanly possible to say? Well, you, on the other hand, are an admitted self-censoring, but you also take humanly possible to mean spam or plagiarizing, tell me again how YOU made a parody of a parody. That one was hilarious.