You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The YouTube Ρurge Is In Full Swing: Ρress For Τruth's Dan Dicks Receives Strike And Is Censored
maybe but they are both censorship according to the definition of censorship. if one is worse or better wasent part of the argument as far as i knew.
:D
If the content is not removed and is present unaltered and nobody can stop or prevent you from saying what you want WHERE you want, exactly how you were free to spam gay porn to force people to remove their flags, how can any of that be censorship? If there is no ability to alter or remove content exactly how do you think it's censorship? Is censorship a Grayed out Post with a button that is clearly visible that UNDOES any "censorship", always every single time? It's not maybe, its a definetly that you cannot censor something SIMPLY because you give your opinion of the content. The content always remains without any change.
It's not about worse or better, its about which one IS and which one cannot be. If youtube puts a warning on videos that have been rated very poor before showing the thumbnail OR the title that would NEVER be considered censorship, but accepting that would mean your double standard and baseless assertion (show us the definition of censorship and explain how and why it applies to steemit curation system) are up for debate, which would be a waste of time as you think what you did when you forced people with spamming gay porn (which you denied that it wasn't even porn, would your porn still be censored if the user had a button that he could click to uncensore it, if they wanted it, would you consider that censored still?) and which you claimed it wasn't even SPAM, and above all of that you believe that you were DEFENDING yourself by threathening people with, gay, censored sex cartoons? posting on all their posts, until they comply with your asinine demands, so save your breath because the stench you leave is atrocious, not only do you not have any integrity, your name is redundant because logic and reason are as abused as your grammar and spelling.
#definitations #imadeaparody #TIMOM #flagdays #itsnotgayporn
i have proven all you say as to be lies, your links to evidence only end up proving you wrong yet you keep repeting the same lies over and over as if someone is going to believe you.
I am done replying to you , have fun writing 50 million more books parroting the same lies over and over and filling my comment feed for a couple days like you do every time you see me talking to someone on steemit.
smfh
How was it Suppressive when you posted gay porn in spite of people Suppressing you? It's either Suppressive or it's not. You haven't proven all I say to be lies at all, you've only made a vacuous claim.
Here is some of your gay spam
https://steemit.com/newslink/@beerbot/newslink-nothing-what-will-remain-uniquely-human-in-an-age-of-ai#@skeptic/re-beerbot-newslink-nothing-what-will-remain-uniquely-human-in-an-age-of-ai-20170202t050148174z
Censored and Suppressed of course.
This is the post where you specifically said GAY PORN and detailed how you will "DEFEND" by threatening people to comply with your demands that they made you do.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@skeptic/steemit-self-defence-meme-2
#TIMOM #definitations
So then, am I Lying, or are you lying about me lying? It can't be both ways now can it? The point is that you have no sense of specificity and context, more than that why would I expect someone that reasons Threats as "they made me do it" to understand the subtle difference between Suppression and Curation.
How Suppressive is it really if people can say what they want where and when they want as much as it's humanly possible to say? Well, you, on the other hand, are an admitted self-censoring, but you also take humanly possible to mean spam or plagiarizing, tell me again how YOU made a parody of a parody. That one was hilarious.
#suppressmewithyourImAspectatormeme #timom #definitations