You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An open-ended question to @ned and @dan
Of course @officialfuzzy's and @sweetsssj's posts are of good content and Quality. But I have seen so many other very very good posts which got only a payout of a few dollars. So I think downvoting is a possible way to adjust the payouts. If a follower of the named authors notices a post which has already apotential payout of several hundred dollars, is it clever to upvote it further??? Why dont these people search some good, but undervalued posts and make some new authors a little bit more happy?
Hmm this is not the case with @officialfuzzy post , all money from them go to the people ............... Chek the posts they are giveaways !
He was flagged one day after often having several posts on trending at any given time. I respect the work he does also, but are his posts the most valuable posts on SteemIt... EVERY DAY? I think not.
Intresting opinion about , acording the trending page . There are several people posting and earn big but no one was flaged even they have 2 or 3 posts per day . The one who get flaged is the ONLY one who give this money back to the comunity and to the minnows . ...........
I like him and the others, so I wasn't comparing anyone to any one else. I was just pointing out a member's work can be valued and appreciated without trending every day. :)
The difference is im using payiuts to build things...not to cash out and buy stuff.
Are the payouts controlled by one user or do multiple people control the account?
Its not a voting account...but it gives tokens out to people who work for steemit, and any other "partnerships" ned might see fit.
All this would be ok to me if he had never used it to try to get me to sell out to him
Is that why he's flagging you?
@fuzzyvest, sorry but it seems your "whaleshares" are not sharing at all.. the same votes going to the same people every day.
Actualy i point many times about the unfearnes of trending page ........... at moment of post people get 200$ upvote and 3 views ? Is this any fair ? Based on what this people trend >? Coments , people intrested ................ or just MONEY !
Hey @whatsup :-)
Perhaps the solution is to fix the trending page algorithm without damaging someone. I can understand where you're coming from, but there are over 1000 people who benefit directly from fuzzy projects.
His posts are what allows the growth and development of these beneficial projects, as well as giving people easy access to all the recent information and opportunities.
Should the entire community allow the almighty god to strike them down whenever he chooses? I don't believe steemit was designed to support such actions.
Of course, if it was ANYONE else in the normal community I wouldn't have a problem with it lol. But coming from ned, that means steemit inc. is taking official actions against specific users for personal/political/opinionated reasons. Do you think that's ok?
Here is one of my many thoughts on the trending page. It is a link, but to an old post. So, Not looking for votes here. :) grins.
https://steemit.com/trending/@whatsup/seven-day-payouts-and-the-trending-page
You are right, time to give others a change to set on trending page. Those names are there for i guess almost a year :)
That was their plan @JuvyJabien.. top witnesses and guild owners control the platform completely now.