You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DON'T LET GREED DESTROY STEEMIT

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

You seem to have misunderstood me. The voluntary community rules come out of people delegating their voting power to a curator they trust to enforce the rules they agree with. Bullies get hit back, therefore there's more money for those who are civil. If you don't like how someone downvotes, delegate to someone who will cancel out their bad downvotes. This is a decentralized company. Downvotes don't take away money, they just change how money is distributed. I'm not telling you how to use it. I'm saying you make your own rules, so enforce them or delegate to someone who will. You're still free to vote however you want - that's the point.

Sort:  

I am not sure I disagreed with much of what you said. It is your vote and yours to do with as you please. The only part I think I disagreed with was the part of community rules.

We need to be able to delegate ....
Once we do that we won't have to worry about upvote/downvote wars ....
Blacklisting accounts for automatic downvote by a voting pool ......

I did not say You could not do that. I disagree with any group censorship/blacklisting and any one telling me that WE which is a term that includes ME what I should do with my vote.

So mostly a misunderstanding of word usage I guess. So Delegate your vote, build your downvoting pool, and censor who you like.