RE: Similar content - different votes, prospected payouts and curation behaviour
I think you can not compare this one-on-one as there might be different circumstances - i think both are awesome - curating or giving votes on comments differs maybe because of left power or any plans people have with their votes. I would NEVER use such a test to judge whether one is better than the other in terms of curating. We could analyse every little piece by everyone but what is the aim of your analysis in the end? Do you expect everyone is voting on every comment? I try to vote a lot on comments including a couner comment but can not do it all the time, sometimes here is a lack of time, some people i consider spamming me will not get a vote, maybe a comment trying to educate them this is not the way to behave.
I just would like to avoid you drag people to certain corners of being good or not good.
Thanks for your comment. Perhaps you misunderstood me. I didn't judge anyone for any reason.
I only wanted to show these two points:
The conclusion from these observation is up to every reader of this post individually.
hmmm not really - you judge them by It turned out that @elyaque is the better curator. He gave more percentage of his voting power. - it might be he was giving you more back on this dedicated post / comment - but you can not use the expression one is a better curator as the other as you compare on vote on one comment - this is a judgement - however i think i understand what your aim was :-) Anyway - let us all work on a great and even better community :-)