I would love to see it back as well. Not my decision to make, tho. I believe if reward pool would go back to where it used to be, the scheme would get back. As for now, it does not make any sense
The organized attacks seem to have ceased, the upvote amounts would have returned to pre-conflict levels .. there is no reason not to continue free-to-play, unless it is a kind of "Fuck You!" to the STEEMIT community, which would be totally uncool.
As one of who showed disagreement, my main concern is there is no explicit usage of illiquid rewards, which consists of 50% of total payouts. SteemSports is very innovative service in terms of utilizing voting power for entertainment, but if all SP rewards are given to the owner as a profit, it can be a very easy way to monetize supporting whales voting power into one's income.
If there is reasonable distribution/use plan about VESTS of steemsports, I am not against their free play games.
No, not at all. The Free PLAYS aren't sustainable because we will keep getting attacked for it by today's and tomorrow's purists who view it as vote buying. We do have another hybrid approach that we can unveil and will experiment with soon. We thank you for your support so far, you are a valued fan of @steemsports.
It's OUR VOTE!!
Isn't that what we hear when we complain about the echo chambers?
It's not about price, most of the money I made was when the price was lower than now.
I'm guessing that it was passing too much power to the plebes?
The redistribution was happening at too great a rate, and 'draining' the reward pool is an excuse?
It is still there, just going through a little transition. Have you tried pay-to-play yet?
Nope, steemsports was sold to me as a redistribution scheme, now that that has changed, I'm out.
I would love to see it back as well. Not my decision to make, tho. I believe if reward pool would go back to where it used to be, the scheme would get back. As for now, it does not make any sense
The organized attacks seem to have ceased, the upvote amounts would have returned to pre-conflict levels .. there is no reason not to continue free-to-play, unless it is a kind of "Fuck You!" to the STEEMIT community, which would be totally uncool.
https://steemit.com/steemsports/@kurtbeil/steemsports-should-always-provide-a-free-to-play-option-for-all-games
As one of who showed disagreement, my main concern is there is no explicit usage of illiquid rewards, which consists of 50% of total payouts. SteemSports is very innovative service in terms of utilizing voting power for entertainment, but if all SP rewards are given to the owner as a profit, it can be a very easy way to monetize supporting whales voting power into one's income.
If there is reasonable distribution/use plan about VESTS of steemsports, I am not against their free play games.
No, not at all. The Free PLAYS aren't sustainable because we will keep getting attacked for it by today's and tomorrow's purists who view it as vote buying. We do have another hybrid approach that we can unveil and will experiment with soon. We thank you for your support so far, you are a valued fan of @steemsports.
It's OUR VOTE!!
Isn't that what we hear when we complain about the echo chambers?
It's not about price, most of the money I made was when the price was lower than now.
I'm guessing that it was passing too much power to the plebes?
The redistribution was happening at too great a rate, and 'draining' the reward pool is an excuse?