You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Human Longevity, SRT1, and Alzheimers Disease: A Brief Review of A Recent Publication
It's nature scientific reports, not nature :)
Less scrutiny. You don't like figure 1F? It's seriously what I would expect given the nature of the samples.
The fact that they weren't completely random scatter is significant IMO.
Now, should someone look for whether that weak ass correlation holds in like 1000 samples? Hell yeah, then we will know it's real. For now it's just a "hmm" sort of plot.