Sort:  

This is a huge bite of physics and astronomy. I am definitely reading it again.

Awesome post!

thanks @rharphelle for reading my article
:)

Awesome article. I wonder why we have seen less of a promising scientist in the youths of today (myself inclusive). I guess, the rave of technology and social media has diverted our attention.

Neutrons and protons are composed of smaller particles called quarks.

Until now, I didn't know about quark (don't blame me, I just didn't know)

Keep the good work

there are many things that we still do not know, steemit can be one of the media for us to share knowledge.
thanks @mrbreeziewrites
:)

Quite true, and I've actually been learning....

Keep the good work going.

I enjoyed reading your blog @whalhesa. I was really interested when you mentioned Stephen Hawking, Invention of Gravity and Theory of Relativity. Awesome! 😉

The theory of everything reminded me of the theoretical physicist and legend; Stephen Hawking

I enjoyed every bit of this article ! hat down ;)

Awesome article.
I wouldn't be able to write all that into a short article if my life would depend on it. You have managed to convey so much in so little space. I am trying to be short in my articles but I always go too deep in a sub-subject and then I have to cut it out for the sake of balance :D

This one gets bookmarked for later reference :D
Cheers!

It seems to me that the article lacks the Holographic Principle (HP), which combines the all above into. Authors HP holds that the universe is 3D image projected off a 2D surface, much like a hologram emerges from a sheet of photographic film. It’s long been thought that the universe at its most fundamental level is made up of subatomic particles like electrons or quarks. But now physicists believe those particles are made up of something even smaller—information. And the information itself is represented by the of pairs of projections of particles on the holographic horizon - this qubit with three states: 0/1/Z.

Thank you 🙏. I’ve just read the entire subjects of the physics in a post by means of your article.

The idea of string theory is not directly accepted by scientists.

Yes. Sure. I agree with this statement. Because all other theories and approaches are someway proven by experimental research. But humanity still has more time to set up an experiment for seeing the results of string theory.

And about Einstein, I think that he died so early. He had time to comprehensively adopt and figure out quantum mechanics to make his own contributions to it. Unfortunately maybe he was the only one to solve this puzzle!

And for M-theory, hope one day someone will explain what that M stands for and thus we’ll be able to see beyond its technical aspects 😀