Stephen Hawking: A New Solution For The Black Hole Paradox
Stephen Hawking published a new theory about the ability of black holes to store information, he proposed this theory last year, but his research newly disclosed now with his colleagues Malcolm Perry and Andrew Strominger before he died.
This paper attempts to solve the paradox of losing information in black holes (loss of paradoxical information). We know that no one can escape the black hole, even the light itself. Therefore, any information related to what has been swallowed black hole must be lost.
In any case, this poses a problem by proposing that all black holes are essentially identical, none of them containing what has happened throughout their history. To counter this, the scientists suggest the "hair" theory, which says that space-time waves and hair can store information on the event's horizon, the inner boundary of a black hole.
"This paper gives a direct picture of fine hair in terms of soft gravitons, or photons on the horizon of black holes," the paper said.
His hair is as follows: They are a single ray of light moving away from the black hole, but they become frozen on the event horizon, according to Michael Byrne of "Matterboard". They are distortions in spacetime in the form of "super transitions" that may contain information associated with black holes.
"This symmetry is the only thing we know about black holes," Strominger explained to the American Science Journal. "You can move regularly back and forth all the time along the rays of light." Strominger is one of the authors involved with Hawking in writing papers.
"But there is another analogy, something new in this paper (although much of it has been discussed elsewhere)," Strominger says, "it is the symmetry that drives individual light rays up and down." A single light ray cannot communicate with each other, I ride one of them, causality prevents you from talking to someone who rides a nearby light, so that these rays of light are not interconnected, and you can make them slide up and down for one to another.
Hawking and his collaborators are particularly interested in particles that have near-zero energy, known as soft particles, or soft hair in this case. These particles are located on the event horizon, so that when they are removed - through what is known as Hawking radiation - these particles can transmit this information along with it along the way in the universe.
When he presented his theory for the first time in August, Hawking said that the information capture was chaotic and useless. But that would solve the paradox of losing the information, which means the black holes are different from each other. This paper is now a theory, and the debate about the whereabouts of poetry or not has actually begun. Tanya Ulf Danielsson A physicist at the University of Osala in Sweden, told the American Journal of Science that same month: "Will it finish anything, or will it make us even more confused?
however, this paper is an interesting proposition that explains how black holes hold some information, perhaps another step toward solving one of the old paradoxes in particle physics.
Reference :
- http://www.iflscience.com/space/stephen-hawking-publishes-new-black-hole-hair-theory/
- https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/07/science/stephen-hawking-black-holes.html
- https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-space-astronomy-and-cosmology/black-holes/black-hole-information-paradox-an-introduction/
- https://www.sciencealert.com/stephen-hawking-just-published-new-solution-to-the-black-hole-information-paradox
Best Regard @t4r1
Stephen was a genius. Thanks for sharing one of his works. Feel free to engage the steemstem community by joining our discord channel, reading and leaving thoughtful and engaging comments on steemstem/stemng posts. Have a beautiful steeming experience
u are welcome @gentleshaid
Hello @t4rl, welcome to steemstem and steemit. Your should always use images from a free source in a post. Shutterstock images are not free. For guidelines on how to be a steemstem member, please visit this post here and on the proper use of images devoid of copyright issues click here. You can also join us in discord by clicking here
thanks @stemng ... I will improve my writing for the future, and will look for the images that have permission
Some analogies or examples would've helped, cos as it is, a lot of parts escape me. And some of the reasons may be grammatical or syntactic, for example I have no idea what this sentence means:
Stephen Hawking was one of the scientists I respect a lot. Glad to see his theory again after his demise
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by abumuhammad from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.