RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 21 - Community Curators for May 2020
Hi @steemitblog
AWESOME! Congratulation to everyone. Especially to @roadofrich, @wherein, @project.hope, @canna-curate, @greece-lover, @remlaps and @stef1
I'm still unclear about this part:
All votes on posts should be accompanied by a curation comment that includes the line “This post has been rewarded by the Steem Community Curation Project. #communitycurationXY” where XY will be the number of your account.
What is "number of my account"?
We are looking for curators to vote for as wide a range of accounts as possible, rewarding quality posts, particularly those that are not cross-posted on other platforms.
Ehm. That would surely take enormous extra amount of time to verify if upvoted content has been posted by particular author only on one chain. I understand idea behind it, however at the end of the day it means that curators will have to invest so much more time. Especially if they would like to support content with smaller upvotes.
I'm trying to imagine situation where I want to support 50 authors with 20% voting power upvotes. Checking if they posted on other platforms (and I assume that we'not talking only about hive chain, but ALL other platforms) could take enormous amount of time. I'm wondering how to approach this.
Yours,
Piotr
The account number will become clear when the key is passed to you.
I suspect you will know many of the authors within your community, and so you will become familiar with their posting habits.
If the requirements are too onerous for you we can skip @project.hope this month and pass the award on to another curator.
Please confirm if you are accepting or not.
Thank you
The Steemit Team
Appreciated @steemcurator01.
Please be assured that our response is positive. We accept this challenge.
Perhaps the emotion of being selected aroused many concerns in us, many questions that we want to clarify. But I understand that this is a new initiative for you also where you will learn from us and the procedures will be perfected in the following months.
Therefore, the selected teams have a great responsibility since we are "Pioneers" in this new modality which I am sure will bring only positive reactions and benefits for more authors.
This strengthens the entire ecosystem: the economy also benefits, there will be a fairer distribution of rewards and the authors who benefit will see further growth in their accounts.
I have a proposal for you:
Could you study the possibility of making the "Conditional Distribution" of the curation SP generated during that month of delegation?
This would be your greatest gesture of kindness towards the curators in charge and the community in general.
What is a "Conditional Distribution"?
You could delegate, suppose for 6 months, the amount of curation SP generated by each curator during this month of delegation.
Thus, after that month had elapsed, the curators would have the opportunity to see their communities grow beyond the duration of the prize of this contest, to grow their accounts in SP and thus have greater voting power to continue doing good work within their communities.
Do you like my proposal? Hopefully they can consider it.
Friend @juanmolina, excellent proposal, I recommend you make a publication to make that proposal.
@steemitblog has a publication where they are requesting ideas, and I think your idea is very solid, in addition to helping both grow in this sense to the one who makes the delegation as well as to the one who receives it.
Yours,
Lanz José
Thanks dear friend.
I´ll try to.
Hi @steemcurator01, @steemitblog
Thank you again for prompt reply and being so communicative.
I'm naturally still interested with offered collaboration and received support. My goal was to share some concerns, which I like to do since I believe that communicating those concerns and learning other people's opinions can only help achieve our goals.
It will help to make things right. That's my learning process, especially when I'm involved into something new. I collect data, discuss things when I'm unclear, share my concerns and then I act.
So again: you can still count on us.
Yours, Piotr
Fellow curators of @project.hope I think it's fair to ask our participants to self declare if they're going to cross post. I think the community is mature enough to understand the situation and the requirement. And if cross posting to "the other community" is important for their income, they can do it after the payout window of #steem, that's their own problem. There's no term for "self plagiarism", but they will have to deal with their "authority" from the other community which like to downvote everything.
Hello @steemcurator01, we very much appreciate the designation of @project.hope to take this responsibility, I fully understand @crypto.piotr and the concern it raises, I think it is reasonable, now, I also know that it is a pilot project and it is It is necessary to listen to and analyze what the community is saying, but I also know that we will organize ourselves to face this challenge successfully.
@steemitblog and the Steemit team got pregnant in an initiative where the contribution of ideas from the community is requested, it is good to analyze and reflect on each approach made by the community, especially when Project HOPE has shown that we are committed to this platform.
Steem's success is our success.
Thank you!
Dear @crypto.piotr, I think your concern is reasonable and I agree that other curators have the same concern. From the point of view that you take it, it is certainly a very demanding job, but like @juanmolina I think they are alluding to Hive even if it is not mentioned.
Our community has the capacity to face this challenge and emerge victorious, there should only be everyone's commitment to organize ourselves in a #tag that only posts that are not uploaded on another platform, so that you can find them better and give them a positive vote .
I think the idea of clarifying posts with exclusive #tag is a good one.
We are innovating, we are pioneers and this must be seen as a way to start a relationship that will bring other things that will benefit the steem chain, steemit and Project HOPE, I think it is worth the effort, if we organize we can do it in the best way and everything will be fine.
That's my opinion!
Sorry for such a late reply
Thx for your comment. I love to see how responsive you are :))
Hi @steemcurator01. Of course we accept the challenge
Team of our project hope , from my humble joy I send everyone a big congratulations, the way things should work is as a team, that premise friend @crypto.piotr starts, you can count on all my help so that our team continues to set standards.
This new initiative will face many challenges, I am sure that we can overcome them without any problem, now we just have to start working so that this comes to a happy end, where we can all win and continue to grow in our reputation.
The rules are clear and we know where it points, so we will follow the assigned guidelines.
Yours,
Lanz José
YAY! That's excellent news! Congratulations to @project.hope Community!
You have always been the engine that has kept the love of the blockchain alive. And I'm sure you've been the main reason many people haven't abandoned this platform in the past. You've always been a person who knows how to motivate people, and you've brought together a lot of great people in the Project Hope community.
Brother, we are making many forward guesswork.
I understand that this is a novel process and there are many questions. But I assure you that STINC also has these.
They need to perfect this new entrepreneurship and to do so, they count on our help.
I'm sure the reference here is clear: we shouldn't cure any publication that is also on HIVE. It's that simple.
To avoid this, we can organize our team of writers.
During the month of delegation, the publications made in our community should not be duplicated in Hive. Those who meet this condition will be beneficiaries of the curation upvote.
I fully agree with you Juan.
It's a learning process for all of us.
Thank you, and I want to wish you success as well!
You can create a script to check all your lists of authors based on your curation criteria. I do this automatically and I upvoted around 5-10 authors every 2 hours depending on my remaining voting power.
Yes if you do this manually, it will not be efficient. Play hard. Work Smart.
Dear @yehey
Thank you for your prompt and kind reply.
Thank you for your prompt and kind reply.
I do like your sense of humour :)
You still would need to to verify every post, to see if it's not being posted anywhere else. They didn't mention hive chain in particular. It means, that I would need to open every post which I want to upvote and search online if it has been posted elsewhere. On any other platform.
This part of task still need to be done manually. And let's say I want to upvote 20 posts daily. It takes much more than 3min / post to go through that process. Which would mean min one hour daily burned. That's a lot.
Please don't get me wrong. I don't have IT skills to build a bot, which would allow me to automatize upvoting system. And I'm not trying to complain.
My only goal is to underline some possible difficulties, which people in my position will face soon. I strongly believe that I'm not the only curator which will face similiar concerns.
And I would like STINC to be aware of those concerns and to be full of understanding. I want to spent time ensuring growth of @project.hope community, bringing new users who share similar interests into our community, guiding them and supporting those users content. I don't want to become a a police-offier.
ps.
Would you be able to help me with this automatization?
Yours,
Piotr
All you have mentioned can be done automatically. Do you think Google, Twitter and other social media do it manually?
I working on a project right now for SteemAccount creation website and creating a weekly report for my curation project, both are in-progress. And besides, it will be conflicting agenda as I also applied for the curator project (sadly not the lucky one). It will become redundant if we both use the same logic of programs.
I'm sure other programmers will be able to assist you. I hope you understand.
Dear @yehey
Of course not.
Excellent. I would gladly share more info about your project with members of our community and help you build some more exposure and traffic. So if you would have this site ready and once you would publish some article about it - then just drop me a message with link to your publication. I will gladly also support your content with decent upvote.
I don't see us as a "competition". If we all want STEEM to survive and perhaps move forward sometime in the future - then people like us need to learn to collaborate. That's my view only.
I would also gladly support your project and I could allocate 1 daily upvote (you could send me one link daily to my discord and I would gladly upvote it). Let's find ways of helping each other, instead of competing.
Thank you again for taking the time to reply. I appreciate it,
Yours, Piotr