You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Great Steem-Tron Meltdown Explained
Could Ned be liable for not disclosing everything? Others are saying the restrictions on Steemit accounts were in the code and just needed to be turned on. It's going to get messy if people go to court. I doubt the witnesses can afford that.
I'm not sure that he needed to, ultimately he owned something and sold it. If those restrictions were in the code, then why did they have to be implemented?
I hope for their sake's it doesn't go to court, because this will financially ruin them, as well as possibly losing their liberty.
Cg
The restrictions weren't specific to that stake. It was just code that allowed a restriction on any named accounts. Presumably to prevent bad actors
Where can we verify that @meesterboom
One thing I have learned about our witnesses is that some of them are not always honest.
You can look at the code. Or there were many posts back at start which explained it. Don't have one to hand though!
k
Justin is a very bad actor.
He also thinks we're complete dumb retards. At least he acts as if he thinks so.
Posted using Partiko Android
Yeah, I didn't say he was a good guy.
I was emphasising that the code wasnt there specifically for the ninja mined accounts
Well exactly, to restrict a particular account because you believe they are about to do something bad is an abuse of power, plain and simple. No wonder he called them hackers.
Maybe they'll decide that I'm about to do something bad, or maybe you next...
Cg