The nature of the issue for me is freedom and a solution that could restore it. That's the issue for me.

The idea of returning stolen property on a magnitude we're discussing is impossible, period. You don't need to add "centrally distribute" or any other filters because it doesn't matter, there is NO way at all to ever return that much stolen property perfectly. You suggest returning stolen property to the respective areas where they were lost. That's equally impossible to do.

I still think we have to try. We do the best we can. That's just common sense.

Problems:

1. Adam’s plan violates ISO
2. The plan is impractical and stifles free market function

Number 1 could be debated for a long time. Number 2 - that's Adam's answer from the debate that I gave you that you still won't acknowledge.

I have tried to help him. He would rather sling mud. Did the same thing to @larkenrose.
He’s just another politician.

Man, you accuse Adam of slinging mud and then turn around and throw out "he's just another politician". It's not slinging mud when you do it? That was a terrible lie that you just told. Time to self-reflect, reevaluate, there's an endless road to rediscover.