New Steempower delegated to @randofish + Bonus Upvotes!!steemCreated with Sketch.

in #upvote7 years ago (edited)

NEW! Using randofish, you will receive more than 20 extra Upvotes!!

Send 0.2 Steem or 0.2 SBD to @randofish with the URL of the post you'd like @randofish to vote on and receive a vote between 30-70%!

5.jpg

Here's how it works:

@randofish will now place a vote with a random vote power of 30-70% on your post!

Good luck!

randobanner.jpg

Sort:  

25 cents with only 8K SP? Are you fucking kidding me?

randofish is 56 cents by now (100% upvote) and you receive 25 other upvotes which are also 10-30 cents at the moment

That sounds alright. You have more than a 50% of being up on the deal.

No sir. He's giving you the best case scenario. Don't be stupid.
The bot is gonna leave an upvote between 1% and 100% not 100%.

I understood your "problem". That is why I changed the value to 20-100%, so nobody will make total loss.

Ok let's crunch some numbers. Assume that the percentage upvote is completely random, you will have an expected payoff of 28 cents (56 cents*50%). Now, lets add 20 cents from other upvotes (mid-point of 10-30), that gives us 48 cents. If we adjust for @randofish's current SP (75%), that gives us 36 cents. If we take out curation, that gives us an expected value of 27 cents (25% curation). 27 cents is greater than 25 cents, that would be a conservative estimate. There will be times that you will get less than 25 cents back but you will get a minimum return of 10 cents (7.5 cents after curation). On the other hand, you could get up to 86 cents (64 cents after curation).

I think it is worth the risk. I got a 1.93% upvote from @randofish today but I think that was just bad luck. I will continue to support @randofish. The randomness adds a bit of fun, will I win or will I lose?

Well said, randomness is what makes this a bit exciting -- and 0.25 is not a big deal to waste, anyway.

Yeah right. What is the chance of getting 100? The upvote is gonna be between 1-100%. That means the minimum is gonna be less than a cent! Randowhale's minimum upvote usually returned the whole fee and if you were lucky, you would get more. This is a rip-off.

look at the comments of randofish, you will see the percentages... youre totally wrong! Most users (not all) make profit...

I did. Most users(not all) are losing.

That is not true! You forgot the 25 Upvotes from the votingtrail. But never the less - just do not use randofish, if you dont want to...

rabdofish looks like randowhale's nephew who just got out of jail or maybe rehab! Lol jk. Way to go on setting this up though.

hahahaha!

This post received a 39.77% upvote from @randofish thanks to @randyw!
Came to less than 9¢, with no vote from @randofish!
https://steemit.com/china/@randyw/hong-kong-the-peak

For 25¢, my "39.77% upvote" came to a series of 3.98% votes that were worth a total of maybe 3¢

randofish replied to @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak 10 hours ago
neuehorizonte upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
infokrieg upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
nuoviso upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
querdenken upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
blockbooster upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
steinzeit upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
topzehn upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
ophelion upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
news24 upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
newsfront upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
politik upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
kidstv upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago
kittentown upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (3.98%) 10 hours ago

I can't believe you actually fell for this and paid for it...

At 25¢, it's easy enough to make up the loss elsewhere - lol

Is there a Discord or steemit chat topic about this guy ??

What is ouyr problem? You got 25 Upvotes - you made profit!

3¢ worth of upvotes for 25¢ is a LOSS of 22¢, but I see that you finally DID come through with YOUR vote - about the time you posted here.
randofish upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (40%) 8 minutes ago
Thank you!

I checked your upvotes - youve got the 25 upvotes, that means randofish MUST have upvoted. But I did not see the vote - dont know why??? Its not the mistake of randofish

randofish upvote @randyw/hong-kong-the-peak (40%) 11 minutes ago
822e04d1Randofish
randofish replied to @randyw/re-msg768-re-randyw-re-randyw-re-r…
11 minutes ago

This post has received a 12.12 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @randofish.

This post has been ranked within the top 10 most undervalued posts in the second half of Nov 25. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $47.60 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Nov 25 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Looks like @randofish is starting to take-off. Great stuff, the minnows really need you.

Thanks for your help, unfortunately I can not donate money right now