RE: Bid.bot and Plagiarism-Copy/paste abuse a fantastic mix: @petervi case
Now, this is the kind of stuff I like to see! Bid bot abuse is a topic near and dear to my heart and people just don't seem to understand how much of the inflation of Steem is robbed due to this irresponsible form of curation.
I think that is putting it lightly as I am more inclined to call any bot owner that willfully allows votes to remain on abuse a facilitator of abuse or I may even go so far to say co-conspirator. It may sound extreme but think it is warranted consider just how much this activity hurts honest people trying their best to earn their piece of the reward pool. Furthermore, if these bot owners don't have proper mitigations such as a blacklist AND whitelist AT A MINIMUM, I would say they too are complicit with abuse. At the very least, they are friendly to it and that makes them not a friend in my book.
I want to emphasize that you did a real good job here. The coordination is an excellent example of teamwork which I hope we all would emulate. Also, your hemingway rating was very good. That was the icing on the cake for me. 🎂
You are close to your first month of contributing to antiabuse with a number of contributions. I think it is safe to say that after this post you have graduated from being new to @utopian-io's antiabuse project to being a contributor that has demonstrated their commitment. I will keep that in mind for your next submission. I will discuss with the mods but I think 10 abuse related posts and 1 month should be the standard. Perhaps we will have a @petervi flag rewards campaign real soon.
If you can identify any active abuse posts, please let me know. This really makes me consider flagging present posts for past transgressions. Starting that should be a thing for users that have successfully cheated the system. I think we should take it from their recent posts regardless if they are abuse of not. That's a topic in itself.
Anyways, keep it up!
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
I'm happy to read this review.
As for bot owners, I also think that much of the responsibility is up to them. They could adopt a revision system based on existing curators, such as curie or c2 / c-squared for example. In this way they would have a good filter on posts that require voting.
As for the grammar in the article, all the credit goes to @steemseph.
As for the utopian, the best way is to work together, we can talk with @Elear and explain the various problems.
That together we can build one of the best cleaning groups and have the means to apply correct ethics.
What I think is that our work is very valid.
but we still have some communication problems.
Working on our communication and working with you all, we can certainly build a great team.
Thanks for mentioning me. I’ll do a better job next time. 😬
Posted using Partiko iOS
XD
Thank you for your review, @anthonyadavisii! Keep up the good work!