You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Making the ideal contribution to the suggestion category #2

in #utopian-io6 years ago

Another very good post in this series. If I could make one suggestion to possibly improve to it, it would be that positive examples would be useful in places such as the proposal description.

The post had minor issues of style and grammar. I will happily give examples of those in a follow-up comment if wanted.

Thank you for the contribution.

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.


Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]

Sort:  

Thanks for the feedback. You can give the style and grammar feedback too. It's all about improving and learning.

Awesome. Here are some examples:

  • "The previous post talked about the general and category guidelines. It provides..." It is entirely unclear what "it" refers to, here. Grammatical logic would dictate that you're talking about the previous post, but "provides" is in present tense. Kinda feels like you lost a sentence.

  • "Understanding the general and category guidelines is not enough to say Yes, I can now contribute and get maximum points." Bolding the latter part isn't enough. It should be in quotation marks.

  • "This template is concise and properly formatted in a way that anyone can understand what you are trying to contribute." When you use "in a way" right after "properly formatted," the expectation is that you will discuss the way it is properly formatted. Replacing "in a way" with "so that" would make this sentence clearer.

  • "a guideline on" should be "a guideline to."

  • "For many first-timers, this is a foreign term that they may not know what it means." This one has a redundancy, and is needlessly convoluted. Something like "Many first-timers may not know what the term means" would be clearer.

Thank you for your review, @didic!

So far this week you've reviewed 13 contributions. Keep up the good work!