"These top 50 authors represent 0.7% of all posters over January 2018 and earned just under 37% of all author payouts from the platform."

Wow. That's some serious wealth inequality. I wonder to what extent,
a) that 0.7% represents the creation of 'quality' content

b) if that 0.7% contributes towards 'funny' content, which can arguably be considered 'fluff', does this mean that the top earners influence that quality/standard for the rest of the platform?