Hello, these look like great improvements. Though, the medal system appears not to be suitable for every Steemmakers user since you mention votes from Steemmakers and Utopian. As it was discussed recently, your project aims are broader than Utopian's so that means not every person voted by Steemmakers can be voted by Utopian as well.
Your post has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
I think you misinterpreted it.
We had it on our mind for a while but now everything is getting on the fast track. Currently we have no quality metric and the steemmakers community account votes at 100% every time. That's no big issue as there wasn't too much SP and content. This is the temporary implementation. We have been thinking of a system to categorize content by quality for a while but didn't prioritize it. The issue is that there is no metric for anyone (including Utopian) to follow the trail according to a quality measure. With the vast Utopian vote it would be no more than fair to prioritize this. The medal system would be a steemmakers only feature for all steemmakers content. Behind the scenes it would be a 1-100% score. Utopian can then still choose to (not) vote on certain articles based on the AI and use our metric as an indication for the % of the vote or not. That's up to you guys, but at least you'll have the extra metric, and we need it anyway.
(Just a sidenote: this meeting happened before the AI news.)