Abuses in the world of contests: @moncia90 case
Such as in the case of @petervi and @magnata that with her 3 accounts @serkagan, @aleks433 and @megafart.
I refer you to these links 1-2 where you will find the various cases.
Today I would like to talk about another very interesting case @moncia90. I noticed a great activity about the content and its participation on the platform I didn't notice anything strange. But at a certain point, reading among the comments I noticed this:After noticing this repetition of names, I went to see what these tags were due to.
I don't want to tag the account owners again, but I leave their names here, so you can see for yourself.
After I discovered @moncia90's modus operandi.
He used the same attitude, also with regard to the contests within @steemmonsters@self-track contest.
Honestly I thought they ended up here... but... in @steemcryptosicko's contest
I'm really sorry for all the users who try to bring new initiatives on the platform...The user @moncia90 has reiterated a fraudulent behavior towards the organizers of the competitions/contests and towards all the users of Steem. He used their accounts for his purposes and to be able to monetize later with the prizes of the competition. This act is even more serious if we consider the fact that @moncia90, in its shady strategy, has used the identities of inactive users that if having won would have made no use of the votes/cards/etc. and taking the prize instead of one of the active users who participated in these contests. By interpreting it on an ongoing basis and reiterating it over time, only to obtain a monetary profit. A true strategy founded scientifically on dirty basis that go against common and expected good costumes and morals.
The fact it was communicated personally to the administrators of the Italian community. Consequently, the roles he had within the Italian community are removed
Now from how you can see his attitude was serial, so we're not talking about a simple mistake ...
I also noticed that @moncia90 is curator in the @OCD community. I'm now curious to know what the mod @acidyo thinks about it.
Abuse of others is really something dishonest. Should be excluded from the platform.
Last update:
After our report the user confessed his abuse, within the Italian community
This is @ilgiaguaro,
Reporting directly from the Jungle.
Onwards!
That user is not a curator of OCD anymore but not because of these reasons.
Thank you for your analysis!
Tasteem is having a similar problem
#re30
you have published a screenshot taken from a private server on discord, do you have the authorization?
Hi @pab.ink , it is not private... if I had shared a private message it was
chat-room is not public. is not accessible to all users
They believe they are the F.B.I. But they are just moron. They have no content to propose, just see their personal profiles ......
Hi @ilgiaguaro!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your post is eligible for our upvote, thanks to our collaboration with @utopian-io!
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Hey, @ilgiaguaro!
Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!
Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).
Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.
Vote for Utopian Witness!
Congratulations @ilgiaguaro! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!