We apologize for the delay in reviewing your contribution. We were trying to get some facts, and that seems to take much of the time.

The post is quite informative and precise. The project is indeed a good one, considering the significant components and the overall purpose of the project.

I appreciate the explanation of how the project works. However, I think the post could be more detailed. You could provide more comprehensive details about the project. Also, you thought, and experiences are required. Although the post contains some personal touch on the introduction section. Then, other information is about the project uses and requirements. While the information is useful, your thought and experiences would be more valuable.

Lastly, the post could have another round of proofreading. I can spot some minor issues that affect the readability of this blog post. I'd suggest a more thorough check of your future contributions.

Thank you!

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.

Need help? Chat with us on Discord.

[utopian-moderator]