RE: Can the potential of Utopian advance cutting-edge science?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Can the potential of Utopian advance cutting-edge science?

View the full context

rudyardcatling (65)in #utopian • 6 years ago

you might be over-estimating the ability of most people to get into the framework needed but i'm always excited to see the basics of reality explained to those who simply live them

i think basic galileo, plato and the concept of uncertainty should be translated to kindergarten concepts in a way , alas im not too good at that

im not particularly comfortable with human spawn

i DO believe all science is basically particle physics

because that is the quantum at which we are stuck

no one has dug deeper so far and some (as usual) consider the latest discovery the last discovery and proceed with the perception to build an image of reality

but basically, all is particles, psychology is particle physics ... economy is particle physics, its simply beyond the point of understanding (or omega) to process that amount of data

give it a read if you think im being mystic because i'm not

you're doing some great work here, but you might consider an extra layer because what you consider to be self-evident is not to a lot

6 years ago in #utopian by rudyardcatling (65)

Sort:

lemouth (72) 6 years ago

you might be over-estimating the ability of most people to get into the framework needed but i'm always excited to see the basics of reality explained to those who simply live them

Maybe, but at least it is worthy to give it a try. The fact that I worked hard in the past to make a developer-friendly framework may help. At the end of the day, it is just a matter of understanding what to code (which may be tricky, but as I said, if we don't try we will never know :p )

i think basic galileo, plato and the concept of uncertainty should be translated to kindergarten concepts in a way , alas im not too good at that

This is possible. I explained the very very basic of general relativity, classical mechanics and quantum mechanics to my son when he was 6. Okay, this was not very deep, but at least he got some grasps about it (and re-explain things to his friends at a science exhibition we were visiting!).

but basically, all is particles, psychology is particle physics ... economy is particle physics, its simply beyond the point of understanding (or omega) to process that amount of data

I don't think so. Particle physics works within its domain of application and one does not need to rely on it to explain things for which other formulations are easier and work. It is moreover often impossible to follow billions of elementary particles at the macroscopic level (which is why classical physics for instance, is still very very valid).

you're doing some great work here, but you might consider an extra layer because what you consider to be self-evident is not to a lot

I am dealing with the general public for more than 10 years... I am well aware of this. Maybe I am dreaming here, but we won't know if we won't try :)

$0.00