You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Looking for Future Show Guests with Personal Vaccine Injury Experience
That problem is everywhere. So many times, when I start to dig into the WHY of a "scientific" conclusion, I end up thinking, that's not what that proves or more often that proves nothing at all... Sassafras tea. Dig into that one sometime when you're board. But thats for our owne protection, so many people were mainlining their teas. Seriously though, thanks for the link.
The funny thing about the study is that no actual experiments were done to come to the conclusion it came to. It is a real example of an ology that is not Natural Science. If you cannot put the evidence on the table so to speak it is not natural science. They just played with numbers and used statistics to come to the conclusion they did. They could just as likely be wrong in their conclusion and it still proves my point. There is no logic or reason to trust such a system.