RE: Feeding meat to a vegan: legal views from a libertarian or classic-liberal perspective
I can't believe someone would do this. After being vegan awhile, bodies don't digest meat the same either, so it's not only a moral issue but she is also possibly making her customer sick! I do understand her frustration that someone claiming to be vegan ordered something with cheese. I assume its someone who confuses vegetarian with vegan. I hope she did not actually "spike" the food as she claimed she did, but she should not of said that either, and being drunk isn't a good excuse. She should also not receive death threats for this either, but I do think she deserves lower ratings. I hope that one day someone who chooses to be vegan will be fully respected and not sabotaged. But in a legal view, spiked anyone's food is not ok! I know some people have been caught using dairy milk instead of almond milk at coffee shops and learned the person ordering is not only vegan, but had such a severe allergy it sends them to the hospital!
That is not the same. Giving peanuts to somebody with a nut allergy is attempted murder or GBH, this is like giving a Muslim pork to eat; a dick move, but not physically damaging.
It may be a dick move and the processing of the body has adjusted but not as extreme. As vegan I feel a certain obligation to make it harder for this company. Her costumer may have felt sick, the one time that I ate meat on accident it woesn't working out that well for me and mr toilet.
However, I would like to see a case against the place and see if my 2 statements I argue are found agreeable by the judge.
Yeah, I think your statements hold water. However, I don't feel I understand the judicial system...