The Gatekeepers Club Taking on New Members or Perhaps They're Old Ones We Have Never Noticed

Introduction

I started out this journey like most believing the utter nonsense of a gatekeeper (Judy Mikovits) and this had me on the wrong path for months. Eventually our little research group, who also does some interviews every now and then, decided that we will chase down the no virus topic. The first talk that we actually paid attention to was that of Thomas Cowan and I was specifically interested in the what he had to say about the Enders 1954 paper and how this man did a control test, which he documented, and disproved all his word. Reading the paper the first time did not make a lot of sense but after a few weeks of research the picture started to come together. These people do like using different terminology in an effort to confuse you. I wrote an article breaking my research down which you can read here (forgive the untidy format, this was done in a haste).

One thing that becomes overwhelming clear once you reach a specific point is how difficult it is to make people see this truth and that is the subject of this post.

Breaking The Wall

I remember that before we realized that no virus has ever been isolated the topic was something that just past you by without anything being registered and I think the main reason for this is the fact that there are so many alternatives. Why you might ask, and the answer is fairly simple. The more alternatives you have the smaller your chance of ever seeing the truth. Therefore, it is my opinion that the first point we need to push hard against is to weed out the gatekeeping scum that is constantly keeping people in a state of hypnoses.

There is currently a trend circulating in the no virus community which I think could be used (to a limit) to point out gatekeepers trying to soften us up to others that is still defending the pathogenic virus lie. I copy a post from one of our telegram groups below to explain this:

"The next big thing are people defending gatekeepers. You will see them in a way defending someone's stance. Giving some reason why they cannot come to the correct conclusion and saying that it is not to say they are bad people... Softening us up on our stance against gatekeepers. One example of this is some people on the "no virus" side not taking a firm stance against those that still sell the infectious virus lie. There is no excuse for this, especially people that call themselves doctors and scientists because the basic steps for virus isolation is so simple to understand that even the normal guy on the street can see that it is total bullshit. There are no pathogenic viruses. People that continue perpetuating this lie are doing so knowingly because they are being paid to carry this message.

You can be forgiven once you start providing truthful information but there will be no grace for you while you are still dishing out horse shit that keep people hypnotized and we need a firm stance against those that continue with this and those that sympathize with these people."

At this point I will be unapologetically brutal when it comes to highlighting the gatekeepers because in my opinion it is the main issue we face in waking others up to the reality of terrain.

The Club

One thing people fail to see is how linked all of these people are and the group I want to place focus on today is what I like to call the Plandemic group. It started off, for me, with Judy Mikovits on her Plandemic documentary (I have written about it here). The three main characters of this series, with Plandemic 2 having followed soon after, was Judy Mikivits, David E Martin and Mikke Willis.

Exposing these three is not to hard, just follow these links (read the video descriptions for more detail):

Judy Mikivots
David E Martin
And last but certainly not least Mikki Willis:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

The debate about these three has long been settled but I found myself scratching my head about someone new recently and the events that played out had to be captured on paper before it started to make sense.

Lee Merrit

Around last year April my friend Courtenay sent me a video on where he asked Lee Merrit some tough questions. Knowing our group by now, you do not defend germ theory or else you would quickly be discarded as a gatekeeper because it really is as simple as that. I went off on a rant bashing her in the description of a video having cut out a segment of the interview to show what she was busy with. The video can be seen here.

The description below the video as follows:

I've uploaded this video not that you could learn some profound new concept that is normally to difficult to understand but rather to teach most, who does not see yet, how a gatekeeper argues. I really can't give a damn anymore who gets mad at this but I've had enough of the gatekeeping scum leading people down the wrong path. I know martin and courtenay. Two of the best chaps you will find. Courtenay is one of my best mates and when it comes to people cutting through the horse shit you will find no one better. Martin interviews Lee Merritt MD and what I want to show everyone is how she avoids the elephant in the room by diverting the conversation. The point that courtenay pushes through is that the topic is unbelievably simple and stops at "THERE IS NO VIRUS". No virus has even been isolated or proven to exist. Nothing else matters and everything this woman (Lee Merrit) says is simply to divert you from the truth.

Lets dissect the video:

• 1 sign of a gatekeeper is the words "I agree with you" followed by an explanation of the contrary. See also the video of Judy Mikovits where she used the same tactic.
• 2 Lee agrees with tenpenny (another gatekeeper) that they don't want to go down this path of "no viruses" because they see it as a distraction. Nothing can be further from the truth. There is nothing out there that cuts through the bullshit cleaner than realising there is no viruses. Something which is unbelievably easy to prove and research if you are not paid opposition, if i might add.
• 3 Having a hero named Luc Montagnier (the pioneer of the AIDS hoax) is another dead giveaway. No man in his right mind can do the research required to wake up from this germ theory lie and look up to Montagnier, a conniving little hair dying bastard that kicked off the AIDS hoax which can be seen as the start of what we are in currently. Also she mentions that "they still gave him the Nobel prize because they could not help it"... yet he accepted it and was part of this bullshit. It is very easy to see the gaps in someone's story if they are lying.
  4 - The simplest way to take back control of the scientific and medical education is to teach people that there is no such a thing as an infectious virus... there is no reason to muddy the waters beyond this point, accept if you are being paid to do so.
  @04mis27sec coutenay blows her whole argument to pieces.
• @05:02 "it goes away... maybe" the utter horse shit after what Courtenay mentioned can easily be destroyed based on what we know to have been proven already [terrain reality] nothing that she says following coutenay's statements can be proven. And that include the DNA changing nonsense, something which has also never been proven to exist is the cgi represented horse shit portrayed in media.
• last but not least "parasites". Need i say more on the subject of terrain theory? Anyone that has done any research on on terrain theory know that parasites are like the firefighters at a burning building. They are as much to blame for the problem (the burning fire) than parasites are to blame being at the scene of the problem in someone's body. This is an MD talking with so much conviction on a topic that is actually very simple. She does not have her head up her arse... she is paid to mislead people.

The answer is very very simple. There is no such a thing as an infectious virus. Not one that has existed in our past, or our present or even an engineered virus or better yet an infectious bio weapon! Anyone carrying this message is either a useful idiot or a gatekeeper.

The Timeline

I found myself scratching my head this week seeing Lee Merrit talking to Thomas Cowan where he explained to her in detail that there are no such a thing as viruses. This was a snipped of a video brought out by Spacebusters named "The End of Germ Theory". I thought to myself what are the chances of her doing this video with Cowan prior to doing the video with Martin and Courtenay. I frantically started searching for the original video on both these interviews and found them to have been brought out as follows:

2022-02-04 - MERRITT MEDICAL HOUR DR. LEE MERRITT INTERVIEWS DR. THOMAS COWAN

2022-04-15 - THERE IS NO VIRUS. IF SOMEONE SAYS SOMETHING ELSE THEY ARE GATEKEEPERS. READ THE DESCRIPTION (The original video can be seen on Martin's channel here, posted on 6 April 2022, interview was around the beginning of April).

This is almost 2 months after the interview that she had with Thomas Cowan. 2 Months to mull over the information and her intentions answering Courtenay's question about there being no viruses is clearly not one of confusion or skepticism but rather one of misdirection.

Some More Nails for The Coffin

We have all seen Judy Mikovits go down in a brilliant glaze when Andrew Kaufman shred her on the Myth is Canada show and another video on True Medicine Library which you can view here. Now what I find fascinating is Lee Merrit limping in to try and keep Judy in the game by bringing out another video with her on the FreedonLawSchool. The video can be viewed here.

If you are aware of her connection with Mikki Willis and David E Martin the last thing I would be trying to do is keep Judy Mikovits relevant because, as it has clearly done, is blow yourself out of the water as well. Lets number the coincidences to sum up this article and then you can make up your own mind:

Mikki Willis can clearly be seen as a crisis actor and Judy was put on the map with a very well presented documentary that was focused on Judy's emotional and hard background "fighting" Dr Fauci and being imprisoned unlawfully for her actions.
Lee Merrit continued to dish out misinformation of spin offs stemming from the germ theory even 2 months down the line of interviewing Cowan.
Lee Merrit continues to give a known gatekeeper airtime in an effort to keep her relevant.
And lastly, it starts to make sense why Lee Merrit mentioned in her interview with Courtenay and Martin that her hero is Luc Montagnier. If she is part of the team that drove the AIDS lie then having this ingrained in your head is not surprising. It should also be considered that these were her words even after the interview with Cowan that should have blown up the virus lie for her.