RE: If I were a billionaire, I'd buy Steemit and...
Hehe , he´s a centralist , stop decentralisation , höhö ?
Oh , I thought the lengendary fork 21 flattened the reward curve so far the users cannot damage the #CHAIN by overvoting , and there are no further curation reward generated having a post upvotet over , what was it , twenty or so , dollars .
And so I do not know what You mean by the word consensus , ... , something ideological ?
It´s a fact , posting is a bonus on a Blockchain , and this bonus has become the biggest advantage of our #CHAINZ , besides the decentralisation , but there has to be some "greed" , a way to get out something , and attraction to put money inside the System , as investment .
The value of a #CHAIN lies in the transactions booked on it , the more , the more value it has .
So , what You write here is the essence of what #WEALL think or may think , and I´ve read theese thing over and over in the last years , and Yes the #STEEM needs urgently some , some , yes , hihi , much some , but the point is #WEAREACOMMUNITY and if the community is not able plus the witnesses to take over again , to connect again , to buildt together again , ... .
Steemit was just the core and all around went to hive when Justin came , and since then , nothing occured but havin´ hive-images blocked , höhö .
So it´s a matter of #SP , witnessvotes and community activity to get something done , in the first place , not some forced industrial evolution .
Thank You .
!invest_vote
You have to play the cards you're dealt ;-). Even decentralized ecosystems still have top-tier players. See, The Rule of Three, for example. Jagdish Sheth makes this argument:
On this point,
I wouldn't say that nothing happened. Steemit has done some creative things with curation - and they replaced and surpassed the things that teams like @Curie had been doing. Curation is one of the blockchain's core differentiators from most other blockchains, so this is important.
But yeah, obviously we need maintenance and growth in other areas, too. And (IMO), that means someone has to organize the effort. There are only a couple plyers here with the level of influence that would be needed in order to do that organizing.
Höhö , that´s what I meant , this is not about markets in the first place , it´s about community and to realize that giving means growth here on the #CHAINZ .
!invest_vote
@udabeu denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient!
@udabeu thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !