You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposal: Witness Development Fund for Steem Code-Review

in #witness-category • 6 years ago

Two things. One, now I feel like I should have just dove straight into C++ instead of Javascript and Python.. Second, steemcreative is currently losing money when it comes to server costs. A fund seems like a great solution for those of us on the bottom.

How many do you think it would take? 2? 5?

6 years ago in #witness-category by
$0.05
  • Past Payouts $0.05
  • - Author $0.04
  • - Curators $0.01
1 vote
Reply 2
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    One, now I feel like I should have just dove straight into C++ instead of Javascript and Python

    I wouldn't say that per-se. Both have different areas of application. @Yabapmatt created Steem Monsters simply with JS. C++ is needed for pure blockchain development.

    Steem needs blockchain developers for growth, but it also needs dApps. So pick your side and stick with it.

    Second, steemcreative is currently losing money when it comes to server costs. A fund seems like a great solution for those of us on the bottom.

    I understand how frustrating it is to lose money with the server, but that's not what the fund is for. And I want to be very clear on that: the idea for the fund is to hire highly skilled developers who should review the code. (for example in preparation of HFs or bigger updates)

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       6 years ago (edited)

      No, I get you, I know it's not to supplement. Apologies if that's how it came across. Agree that it's a good idea to hire third party devs of the witnesses choosing to review code

      $0.00
        Reply