Palastine

Although most Palestinians from different parties reiterate that they agree on the diagnosis of what is happening in Palestine, and that the disagreement between them on the treatment, which leads to the cessation of diagnosis of the situation and the transition to treatment, but the dispute also revolves strongly on the diagnosis. The proper diagnosis is known as half the treatment. So what happens, and what treatment?

What simply happens, far from empty speculation and the claim of knowledge, is that the Palestinian national movement in all its components, albeit to varying degrees, has become outdated, abandoned, corrupted and corrupted, and has largely lost the ability to change, innovate and reform, proper thinking and action, as well as initiative and creativity.

Proof of this is that Palestine and the Palestinians are living in a catastrophe, despite the steadfastness, challenge and various forms of heroism and resistance that have made the case still alive, and will remain alive despite what it suffers at the hands of its elites, leaders and factions. The old, although he is in control of the political scene is unable to progress, and the new is not yet born, there are implications and what can be called a new space, but it is still elusive and unable to lead on the basis of crystallization of realistic strategic alternatives around which the wider sectors and categories of the people.

After the great achievements that he achieved, the old tried to stop the history, or to maintain the situation, but it is constantly deteriorating, albeit not regularly, and exhausted the idea of ​​liberating Palestine through the armed struggle as a single road, deep in Arab and universal human liberation. First, the negotiations first, and the second, and the combination of peaceful popular resistance with or without negotiations, third, did not achieve its objectives, but reached the situation we are living now, which prompted President Mahmoud Abbas to say during his recent visit to Cairo that those who say that can be created A Palestinian state within 15 years Under the deepening of the occupation and the frightening and dangerous expansion of settlement colonization, and move away in the judaization and annexation of Jerusalem and most of the West Bank, which effectively annexed Israel. And the declaration of its official annexation is only a matter of time unless the variables of the table's volatility show the occupation.

The "new", which is also old, tried to resume the process of liberating Palestine and rehabilitate the armed struggle with the horizon and religious dimensions of Islam, and ended up in a besieged authority in the Gaza Strip needed to transfer the Qatari funds to maintain calm and prevent the collapse of the sector, The contest for power under the Oslo Accords, entered the elections and obtained the majority and was not possible to govern because of the Israeli rejection first and foremost, and the rejection of the US, the international and the Arab second, and the rejection of the Palestinian mainstream third.

This party should realize that it will not be able to lead the Oslo Authority without paying the price paid by the original owners of Oslo, unless there is a decisive change in the balance of power. It is true that the perception of the possibility of changing the authority of Oslo from within, and that it will use power to serve the resistance, but it ended that the resistance has become more and more means to serve the survival of power in the sector, as shown through the truce (truce) The first time for the success of the government of Mahmoud Abbas in 2003, which was formed in the context of the plan to change the Palestinian political system by creating the post of prime minister and granting him powers to weaken the leadership of the late President Yasser Arafat, who rejected the generous offer at Camp David in 2000.

The failure of the Oslo agreement and the unilateral armed resistance strategy were supposed to open the way to adopting a new course that is fundamentally different, but this did not happen despite the mutual claims of the two sides of the divide, but rather the beginning of a competition. A Palestinian entity besieged in the Gaza Strip and under the constant threat of aggression if it does not follow the path prescribed for it. It can be called a "state" and a self-rule over part of the West Bank, that is to say, the inhabited enclave, Direct Israeli occupation Wen Israeli sovereignty over everyone.

In fact, what has been done, consciously or unconsciously, is a kind of coexistence with the colonial colonial colonial realities that have ended the long conflict to this day. Yes, there is a verbal rejection of it, and attempts to improve this reality, as we see in the continuation of the option of resistance, especially after the popularization of peaceful popular resistance, but on the basis of deep conviction and more aware that this is the maximum we can get. So we have witnessed and witnessed a struggle between the two sides of the division to control what is allowed to control it, each in its area of ​​control, with the dream to extend this control to the area controlled by his opponent, and to gain "legitimacy" from the base of loyalists and not popular will, rather than conflict to break this reality Through the provision of the requirements of directing the conflict towards the geographical space stricken by the deepening of colonial settlement control systems.

Thus, the contradictions assumed to be secondary to the supposed conflict were overshadowed by the evidence of continued security coordination and recognition of Israel despite the threat of a change of course and the cancellation of Oslo on the one hand and the absolute priority of continued unilateral control over the Strip on the other. Not to collapse the sector so as not to throw the lava on them, the presence of a dominant power better than chaos and confusion.

What we come to and deal with is encapsulated in different ways, in varying degrees of denial. There are those who say that the wind sows the storm, that is to justify what is going on, that we have got what we deserve and nothing more. There are those who place all responsibility on the Arabs who gave up on us, on the leadership of Yasser Arafat, on the failure of the Arab or Islamic Spring, and on the fact that the world