I asked Chat GPT about the expected problems when applying the yellow envelope law.

There are a lot of articles, so those who want to see the results only need to look at the question five times.
How much do you agree with the answer to the question?
The restriction of the user's right to claim damages can have the effect of reverse discrimination when applied, so there is a consensus.
In any case, I hope that we will proceed in a way that minimizes problems between labor and management.

Question 1. Describe the expected problems from the user's point of view when the scope of workers expands as follows.
Answer: As the scope of workers expands, the problems expected from the user's point of view are as follows.
Additional Cost Burden: If the scope of workers expands, users will have to take more protection measures against them than before, which can result in additional cost burdens. This requires institutional reform to improve the working conditions of workers, which requires active cooperation by users.
Increased uncertainty: Users may not understand regulations on people who were not previously considered workers, and uncertainty may increase. In addition, the interpretation and application of new regulations is required, and users should make greater efforts to comply and apply them.
Legal Liability: Additional regulations and protective measures are more likely to result in liability if the user fails to comply. Therefore, users must understand the new regulations and protective measures and have systems and procedures in place to apply them.
Increasing complexity in business operations: Users need to manage and supervise more workers than ever before, which can increase complexity in business operations. As a result, users must comply with new regulations and protections while maintaining operational efficiency.

Question 2. Describe when a problem arises from the user's point of view when the existing definition of labor dispute is changed as follows.
Answer: As the existing definition of a labor dispute has changed, the scope of what is considered a labor dispute is wider if the arguments between the labor parties are inconsistent. The following are possible issues for the user:
Increased likelihood of conflict: Conflict is more likely to arise because it can be considered a labor dispute if there is a disagreement between labor parties. This may require users to spend more time and effort negotiating and compromising with labor parties.
Need to be proactive: Conflicts between labor parties can lead to labor disputes, so users should be more proactive in improving working conditions through negotiations and compromises with labor parties.
Legal Liability: A disagreement between labor parties can lead to a labor dispute, which may require users to resolve legal issues through negotiations and compromises with labor parties. This requires users to understand and comply with new regulations and protective measures.
Increased complexity of business operations: Conflicts between labor parties can lead to labor disputes, which can lead to difficulties in business operations through negotiations and compromises with labor parties. As a result, users must comply with new regulations and protections while maintaining operational efficiency.

Question 3. Describe when a problem arises from the user's point of view when the provisions related to compensation for damages of the labor union are changed as above.
Answer: The following are the problems that the user may experience:
Unable to compensate appropriately: If the amount of damages is reduced or exempted according to the criteria for claiming the amount of damages, the user may not receive appropriate compensation. This means that the damage caused by the user's industrial action is actually greater than the damage reduced and can cause infringement of the user's rights.
Acceptance of unfair demands by the other party: If a trade union or worker exploits Article 3-3 to make unfair demands to the employer, or if an act of dispute interferes with the operation of the employer's business, the user has limited opportunities to defend it. This can cause infringement of your rights and interfere with your business operations.
Legal Uncertainty: If the content of Article 3-3 is specified, but the court's criteria are not clear, the user may experience legal uncertainty. This can cause infringement of the user's rights by making the user not fully aware of how to deal with the claim for reduction or exemption of damages.
Undue Cost Burden: In the event of a legal dispute regarding a claim for reduction or exemption of damages, the user must actively respond. This can increase the cost to the user, and it can cause the user's financial burden.

Question 4. Then summarize the preceding and describe the problems that will be returned to the user when this amendment is applied.
Answer: When this amendment is applied, the following are the problems that users will experience:
Increased costs due to the expansion of the scope of workers: If the scope of workers is expanded under the amendment, additional cost burdens may be incurred because users will have to strengthen their protection.
Difficulty in detecting trade union destruction: If the amendment includes trade union destruction as an illegal act, users will have to come up with countermeasures because it is difficult to detect even if the trade union actually does it.
Undue burden of damages due to restrictions on claims: If the restrictions on claims are extended under the amendment, the employer will not be able to compensate for damages caused by active activities of workers and labor unions. This can cause undue damage to the user.
Uncertainty due to claims for reduction or exemption of damages due to industrial action: If the amendment enables a claim for reduction or exemption due to industrial action, the user may experience legal uncertainty because the criteria for claim for reduction or exemption are not clear.
Difficulty in applying the principle of fair loss sharing: In order to apply the principle of loss sharing according to the amendment, it is necessary to identify the cause and extent of the damage. However, this is difficult to apply in practice, so fair division of damages may not be achieved properly.

Question 5: Out of the above answers, summarize the three major problems that are expected and explain them in more than 300 characters per item by item.
Answer: The main expected problems when this amendment is applied are as follows:

1. Undue burden of damages due to restrictions on claims for damages
   If the limit on claims for damages is extended under the amendment, users will not be able to compensate for damages caused by active activities of workers and labor unions. This can cause undue damage to the user. If a trade union is active, it may incur additional cost burdens, as users will have to respond actively. This can cause an economic burden on the user.

2. Uncertainty due to claims for reduction or exemption of damages
   If the amendment makes it possible to claim for reduction or exemption of damages due to industrial action, the user may experience legal uncertainty because the criteria for requesting reduction or exemption of damages are not clear. This can cause infringement of the user's rights by making the user not fully aware of how to deal with the claim for reduction or exemption of damages. In addition, users may have to pay additional costs to determine the criteria for claiming damages.

3. Difficulty in applying the principle of fair sharing of damages
   In order to apply the principle of sharing damages according to the amendment, it is necessary to identify the cause and extent of the damage. However, this is difficult to apply in practice, so fair division of damages may not be achieved properly. This can lead to conflicts between employers and workers or trade unions, and can lead to infringement of users' rights. If these problems are not sufficiently solved, the conflict between the employer and the worker or trade union is likely to intensify.