Sort:  

If there was blame, you might have to look at Pewdiepie as he was the main reason the advertiser's​ all​ started to complain after the press decided that he was promoting the Nazi's and they kept harping on about how some adverts appeared on his channel while a movie of Hitler's​ speech​ was on... all utter nonsense​, but from then on it's been a case of attacking the smaller channels​ that go against the political grain of YouTube. Channels like​ mine are not a threat to anyone, but I get punished​ so that the ones who created the problem can earn more advertising revenue. The Logan Paul incident was just the final excuse that YouTube could​ use to hammer everyone and finally allow it to do what it wants... get rid of the bottom feeders and only pay the people who live and breathe YouTube 7 days a week.

Pewdiepie was the cause of the 10K rule YouTube made back in April. Instead of making hefty requirements to monetize how come YouTube doesn't just review the video before its published. That will make sense rather than punish and kill off small YouTubers

I honestly could not agree more, but we all know that the reason they done it was the little guys are taking some advertising away from the bigger channels, and in turn they feel they are not giving as good a promotion to advertisers... I would disagree with this as I ignore the adverting from all the larger channels, and tend to watch and replay them on smaller YouTube channels to help them out.