Comments Record [Julian Assange: The 2011 60 Minutes Interview]

For posterity and reference:
re:
Julian Assange: The 2011 60 Minutes Interview

622

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
7 months ago
What crime did Assange expose in 2016? Russian espionage in our election?

3

Collin Lunsford
Collin Lunsford
7 months ago
@Fred Freddy Not sure. FYI, 2016 election interference is not what he's being targeted for. The United States is trying to lock up Assange for exposing war crimes they committed.

8

Pet_Love
Pet_Love
7 months ago
SpaceDust - Love that!

1

Anne Chester
Anne Chester
6 months ago
LooooooooooooL

Anne Chester
Anne Chester
6 months ago
@Fred Freddy
Noooooo

Anne Chester
Anne Chester
6 months ago
S.D.
LoooooooooL

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
6 months ago
@Collin Lunsford That was a long time ago. What does Wkileaks do now, or since 2016?

They (wiki) function as an aid to Putin against democracies.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
4 months ago
@Fred Freddy The US is the country that works with regimechanges and meddling in other countrys elections.

2

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Collin Lunsford So, the quote has nothing to do with Assange. 10-4.

U: "The United States is trying to lock up Assange for exposing war crimes they committed. "

I know about the conspiracy to hack into US gov't computers charge.

What do you think Assange is being charged with?

1

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Anne Chester I don't understand what you are trying to say.

Collin Lunsford
Collin Lunsford
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy Assange is a journalist. A journalist reports stories. He's not a hacker. I assume that some of the people who helped create and still maintain Wikileaks 'can' hack; Wikileaks was created for Assange to release information that was being held secret from the public (so obviously Wikileaks needed/needs skilled computer engineers to evade the governments). I understand why people think that information should have been disclosed to the Pentagon first, but there is no doubt they would have smeared the information either way as they were already covering up the all the civilian deaths from the drone attacks. And there were A LOT. They knew about it... They already f***king knew about it.

The quote stands.

1

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Collin Lunsford Assange is charged with conspiracy to hack into US gov't computers.

Allegedly, Assange told Chelsea Manning how to hack into gov't computers to get more stuff for publishing.

However, Assange timed the burgled email dump to aid Trump by helping to dampen coverage of Trump's Hollywood Access serial groping confessions.

1

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter Which countries did the US election-meddle?

I'm familiar with some from a long time ago during the 1980s and 1960s. Anything recent-ish?

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy More then meddle .Is always active.Even regime changes and trials for regime change. Ukraina -Maidan. Venezuela Bolivia . Brasile. Often in second by so called NGO. In Russia EU ( but EU akcept that ao far(NATO). Iran Turkye and entire Sahel zone.Georgia and so on.USA is a empire has military bases and Private contracters in over 100 countrys. check out reveals from Wiki Leaks and Edward Snowden. So meddeling is just the soft part of what they do.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter So the US has meddled in elections using Non-governmental Oraganizations.

That's allowed. Rather than scatter shot all over, could you note something specific or an instance of this meddling?

I suspect you may have a few real examples to note...provisionally.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy honestly if you really want to know. you have to digging yourself. Just be careful.Yes you might try to listen to the former CIA agent Kevin Shipp and others.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy Hong Kong . prolly together with the UK and further more you can see here.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy about the Ukraina

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy More about Ukraina the compleat phonecall with Victoria Nuland.But pls digg more yourself.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy further more. Seymour Hersh talked about Abu Graib ,later Mannig deliverd the proofs . About Syriah here

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter So, you can't cite a single example of election meddling? NGOs are not election meddling.

So I have to sort through YouTube vid. Great.

Okay. Afghanistan. Yes. I would accept that definitely. Afghanistan is not a stable country and never really was a country as we know it.

Honduras had a coup and Clinton supported having elections right afterward. Sort of meddling, maybe.

The US supported elections in Haiti in 2015. No clear winner and we're still waiting for the runoff. That's not election meddling.

Yes. The US overthrew the elected Iranian government in 1953, and installed the brutal Shah/dictator. That was a long time ago.

And, in 1954, fresh from their success in Iran, protecting British rights to extract oil and pay nothing, the CIA went after the Guatemalan government.

(Neat book on Guatemala called "Unfinished Conquest.")

Any recent election meddling?

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy What is electiom meddling against regime change and falsk flag actions. In Syria support of the so called Moderate opisition that is nothing else the ISIS and al kaida. Is much worde then just medlling. Yes they do not meddle as long a country does as the US wants. if not they start with hard gloves. Like ukraina venezuala... But of course the us is just the tool of the deep state. .

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
Using the alternative warfare is what they did to change opinion in Venezuela. Using the OMF and the world bank to interrupt the econpmie of the country. to start with .Meant to change the opinion inside the country. all about that you can find in wiki leaks . If that is not meddling in election what else? but did not work out in Venezuela. Thanks god.
see that linkd is a lot of stuff. file:///H:/politik%202/wiki%20leaks/us-fm3-05-130.pdf

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy some NGO are "NGO# closed to the CIA. And alternative warfare is meddling in first place even long term .Yes i say since years is meddling that way going on against Venezuela. NGO are inde4mined by the CIA. Like human rights watch. for example. According to Kevin Shipp

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter Can you think of any US election meddling in other countries recent decades?

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter The US doesn't have a Deep State. Turkey, Egypt, Fiji, and Pakistan have Deep states.

Deep State nations have regular military coups. We haven't had anything like that since the 1860s.

Just information only.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy Yes it has

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter Can you explain without making me watch a YouTube video? It's good practice to write for yourself.

Rolf Sautter
Rolf Sautter
3 months ago
@Fred Freddy Sorry i have not the time for that. If you don't have the time to watch videos od trusted people ,how can you expact from me to write a entire book here for you? it is what it would needed of me t.Sorry

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
@Rolf Sautter Okay

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago (edited)
@Rolf Sautter a 55 minute Snowden video? Why can't you just gather up some information, and present it?

Try to focus so you aren't tempted to make a giant one-paragraph manifesto of all your beliefs and peeves.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago (edited)
​@Fred Freddy Hahahah! Russia! :'D The alibi of the unimaginative. Anyway, your proof? Wikileaks is the only news platform that has NEVER retracted any publication. You can research for us if that's true. However, since you don't seem to know how to research, follow them on Twitter to find out what they're STILL doing ;') easy-peasy.
That is despite their founder/leader being imprisoned and tortured.
In that regard, prove to us that he's not being tortured, and that the current treatment of Assange is NOT illegal. Prove those things to to us ;')

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy Assange DID NOT hack the U.S. His sources may have.
What about the Afghanistan papers? Why isn't anyone in the Washington Post being charged with espionage?
How about the Panama Papers, anyone charged for that?
What about all the international illegal escapades of the U.S.?
They have military bases around the world. Are those legal?
Violating international airspace and bombing countries without Congress' approval? Legal?
Bombing countries at all that has NOT threatened the U.S. security? Legal?
Funding, training, supporting terrorists and rebels for proxy wars? Legal?
Military testing bioweapons on American citizens! Legal?
https://www.businessinsider.com/military-government-secret-experiments-biological-chemical-weapons-2016-9
Monstanto.. Legal?
//

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang Assange didn't hack the US. Correct. He is charged with conspiracy to hack.

There is a difference between leaking information and burglarizing (or conspiring to burglarize) someone's mail or email.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
Who else in the history of "conspiracy to hack" has been charged of it?
Who else should be charged with "conspiracy to hack"?
And like I said:
Assange DID NOT hack the U.S. His sources may have.
What about the Afghanistan papers? Why isn't anyone in the Washington Post being charged with espionage?
How about the Panama Papers, anyone charged for that?
What about all the international illegal escapades of the U.S.?
They have military bases around the world. Are those legal?
Violating international airspace and bombing countries without Congress' approval? Legal?
Bombing countries at all that has NOT threatened the U.S. security? Legal?
Funding, training, supporting terrorists and rebels for proxy wars? Legal?
Military testing bioweapons on American citizens! Legal?
https://www.businessinsider.com/military-government-secret-experiments-biological-chemical-weapons-2016-9
Monstanto.. Legal?
//

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/investigations/afghanistan-papers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

//
https://www.wired.com/story/terror-industrial-complex-isis-munitions-supply-chain/
//
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers
//
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking
//

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang Conspiracy to commit any crime is a real thing. Bypassing a security password in an NSA computer network is illegal. So, conspiring with someone to do this is bad...in the eyes of the law.

They might not even be able to prove the case against Assange. He sent hacking software to Whatshername and advised on its operation in messages. Maybe that's not enough.

Besides,

The UK will never extradite Assange to the US under current US management. Barr and trump have created too much chaos in the DOJ with their political witch hunts of Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Biden, and Obama. (None turned up anything.)

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
You didn't answer my questions.
And you're still talking like laws and legalities still matter here.

They're torturing Assange.
He has no proper access to his legal team.
No access to medical or psychological treatment.
CIA is dealing drugs.
U.S.A. is supporting terrorism.
//
For what purpose are you talking about "law"? It doesn't matter to them.

"The UK will never extradite Assange to the US"??
They don't have to extradite him to KILL him.
"Law" is relative.
--
And answer my above questions.
WIth proofs or at least evidences.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Rolf Sautter I understand. You can't argue your point.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy "Why can't you just gather up some information, and present it? Try to focus so you aren't tempted to make a giant one-paragraph manifesto of all your beliefs and peeves."
Your words. Why don't you do those things yourself?
And answer my questions. PLEASE.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
"Which countries did the US election-meddle? I'm familiar with some from a long time ago during the 1980s and 1960s. Anything recent-ish?"

Venezuela 2019-2020. Not only recent-ish. It's happening RIGHT NOW ;')
//
more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/13/the-long-history-of-the-u-s-interfering-with-elections-elsewhere/

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang So we got it sorted that conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime. Neat.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago (edited)
​@Fred Freddy
Where/when did we sort it as a crime?
I said that laws don't matter here. There's no crime in a lawless, illegal nation, i.e., America. OR everything's a crime. You pick whichever you wanna believe.
//
And answer my previous questions :') Neato?
Neato.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang U: "Where/when did we sort it as a crime?

I said that laws don't matter here..."

oh

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
You can't conspire to break into a computer network and not expect to get into trouble for it.

And, you can't ignore the law because the US did bad things in history. It doesn't work that way.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
@Fred Freddy You didn't answer my questions.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago (edited)
​@Fred Freddy
"And, you can't ignore the law because the US did bad things in history. It doesn't work that way." ~FreddyFredFreddySaid . PROVE IT.
AND AGAIN:
"Why can't you just gather up some information, and present it? Try to focus so you aren't tempted to make a giant one-paragraph manifesto of all your beliefs and peeves."
Your words. Why don't you do those things yourself?
//
And answer my questions.
PLEeeeeEEEASsssSSSE.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
U: "oh"`

Me: ^-^

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang Would you like me to prove water is wet?

You are asking for proof of a negative.

We would have to go through the US code line by line and note through the years as we search that we find no legal exemption for hacking or conspiracy-related crimes due to the nature of US foreign policy.

What you would normally do is find an anomaly or a bunch of anomalies that undermine my statement.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago (edited)
@Shadoufang Hello,

I don't know what "^-^" is I use words. It looks pointy.

I was just acknowledging that you said something. I barely qualified the statement and just wrote, "oh".

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
Henceforth, I will call you Freddypinion, because you're all opinion :')
Answer my questions.

You can't do it, because you'll either contradict yourself or lie. ;')
Neat.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
oh ^-^
And here, I acknowledge you not doing what you say/said >>
Freddypinion: "Why can't you just gather up some information, and present it? Try to focus so you aren't tempted to make a giant one-paragraph manifesto of all your beliefs and peeves."

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago (edited)
​@Fred Freddy Freddypinion: "You are asking for proof of a negative."
Okay, prove this positive statement:
The U.S. government has prosecuted either GW Bush, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, or Mike Pompeo, for lying to the American citizens or the international community, and for supporting terrorists/terrorism in the world.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang You're just running in circles with your arms flapping now.

Just know a crime is a crime and it is illegal in the US to conspire to commit a crime.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
Hi Freddyflapinion.
Nope. No limb-flapping here.
You're evading me.
Answer my questions. Save yourself ;') Or.. well.. flap your arms AND mouth like what you're doing now ;')
//
"Just know a crime is a crime and it is illegal in the US to conspire to commit a crime.
"
Easy to say, Howevvvvvverrrr.. . Prove that your U.S. laws work flawlessly against criminals, then.
That's a positive statement. Would be REALLY easy for you to prove, eh?
;')
oh!
Neat!
^-^

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
btw, Freddyflapinion, I'm not running in circles.
But your head's exploding right now.
Answer my questions. Prove my positive statements.
;')
"oh"
Neat.
^-^

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
2 weeks ago
​@Fred Freddy
Darn.. . anyone know where Freddyflapinion went?
I'm ghosted again. Story of my life.
Neat.
^-^

u3962521
u3962521
1 week ago
And those criminals are the politicians and heads of state we should have trust in to do what's right

Honey Flower
Honey Flower
6 days ago
Not just Anonymous, EVERYONE.

Honey Flower
Honey Flower
6 days ago
@Fred Freddy Groping confessions? I never heard about that. Did the accusing person take him to court? Or is this just libtard propaganda?

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
6 days ago (edited)
​@Honey Flower Freddyflapinion has left the building. He's all opinion and mouth-flapping without proof or evidence. (Can't even prove a positive statement that he asked for HIMSELF.)

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
Same intro as this for Edward Snowden:

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
6 months ago
00:32 "and Assange is currently under LEGAL attack from the U.S. government..." Funny that he EMPHASIZED "legal" there. I think he knows it's NOT legal. Or if it were, then the US Gov. should NOT have been doing ILLEGAL things in the first place.

1

Jiyan
Jiyan
10 months ago (edited)
I wanna cry when i listen Assange, he risked his life and his freedom
This man should be honoured but usa rather want him in their prison
You're my HERO
And you will have my respect until the last day of my life and you will not be forgotten by millions and millions
FREE ASSANGE!!!

964

basejumper1379
basejumper1379
10 months ago
agreed

18

Tattletale RED
Tattletale RED
10 months ago
We Can also Now see in Eric Holder, that Obama’s administration is guilty also.

The Universal Rule always applies “is” Never shoot the Messengers because they are GOD SENT.... GODS revenge will be unprecedented as a Just and Loving God.

Deceivers Beware for you will be deceived as fall gods.

15

Thomas Lightningbolt
Thomas Lightningbolt
10 months ago
The REAL terrorists want Julian dead.

33

Tattletale RED
Tattletale RED
10 months ago
Thomas Lightningbolt
But their spirits will be haunted forever and We shall never forget who they are until they can suffer what they have sown.

• This should be made visibly so that others will beware of such crimes against Humanity.

7

mcwolfus 1
mcwolfus 1
10 months ago
... and yet you enjoy the life that oil brings you ie you dont live in a ditch and instead live like a king.

1

Alana Imboden
Alana Imboden
9 months ago
He deserves the novel peace prize for his courage I’m so proud to be Australian

18

Jiyan
Jiyan
9 months ago
@Alana Imboden they prefer to give novel prize to obama or other corrupted politicians

12

Jiyan
Jiyan
9 months ago
@helen schneider i don't believe that, if he is really done anything like that, then Sweden should take him to the court but i don't believe those allegations

7

saturdaysun10
saturdaysun10
9 months ago
@helen schneider These charges were falsified. There is much evidence to that end. USA has actually charged him, and they're working on additional charges. Facts do, indeed, matter.

14

Brookster Q
Brookster Q
9 months ago
He can crash at my place!

6

David Edwards
David Edwards
9 months ago
You obviously have very low standards. My heroes are not cyber-hackers who steal secret information, then run away and hide so as not to be prosecuted.
My heroes haven't run away and hidden from RAPE charges. My heroes are real men that will fight charges, or not commit the crimes in the first place. But hero and Assange are not 2 words I would use together.

Gina-Lee Hutchin
Gina-Lee Hutchin
9 months ago
@Alana Imboden he has been nominated 7 times, for the Nobel Peace Prize.
I'm also a proud Australian, but ashamed of our Government.
Please let Scomo know that you care about Julian Assange.
#Free Julian Assange.
https://www.pm.gov.au/

8

Gina-Lee Hutchin
Gina-Lee Hutchin
9 months ago
@helen schneider under age?
You definitely have your facts wrong.

Alexander Redhorse
Alexander Redhorse
9 months ago
yea and let's be honest we are all pretty powerless on to fix it. we will all be next

2

Gina-Lee Hutchin
Gina-Lee Hutchin
9 months ago
@Alexander Redhorse not if we stick together and tell the powers that be, we will no longer put up with their injustices.
Our only hope is our solidarity and voices, regardless of religion or race.
We are all brothers and sisters and I believe the majority of us want peace.
There are more if us, than there are of 'them' and their biggest fear is if we all stand together against 'them'.
That is why they are working so hard to cause division and hate amongst the peoples of the world.

8

Slave2PaperWithInkOn
Slave2PaperWithInkOn
9 months ago
LICKLE workers vs -- BANK£R$-$$$$$$$$ !

Padriac Pearse
Padriac Pearse
8 months ago
helen schneider I guess this, doesn’t hold the test of time

Prayer Warrior
Prayer Warrior
8 months ago
Jiyan agree!

Prayer Warrior
Prayer Warrior
8 months ago
Alana Imboden I'm with you!!

Tattletale RED
Tattletale RED
8 months ago
David Edwards
You gotta flip that around to get the Truth

What if all of a Sudden, you were attacked (by a higher power) for anything that you’ve Done?

Including put in prison for writing your thoughts HERe
Would that be OK 🤔

I’m saying if this Law was passed tomorrow???
Honest Answer after thinking about it 🧐

3

Not Socrazy
Not Socrazy
8 months ago
He shall visit China

CjPiper
CjPiper
8 months ago
Assange did. Nothing, NOTHING Wrong. How can someone be wrong in exposing misleading crooked Goverment.

4

Paka Lolo
Paka Lolo
8 months ago
Who is the real bad people.? Any government.

2

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
8 months ago
Assange is a Russian stooge. He started out exposing Cheney/Bush war stuff, but now he's just a pro-Putin thrall.

1

GIBRONN AQEEL ANDRIES
GIBRONN AQEEL ANDRIES
8 months ago
The problem is you risk your life and still the world don't believe or they fast asleep coz they live in paradise

2

PatriciaWalton
PatriciaWalton
8 months ago
It's not the people of the US. it's the government! It's come down to a war over this man!

1

PJ JP
PJ JP
8 months ago
Jiyan Trump will protect him! Trump said he loves Wikileaks! Info implies JA is in the US

Caligula
Caligula
8 months ago
Don't you dare to cry!. Stand up!, Rise!, Fight back!.

1

Traci Davis
Traci Davis
7 months ago
@mcwolfus 1 Some of us prefer to keep our integrity intact to the accumulation of material wealth.

Traci Davis
Traci Davis
7 months ago
@David Edwards Because you're content in your slavery.

3

Traci Davis
Traci Davis
7 months ago
@BelizeHD He's been imprisoned for 7 years. That's risking his life.

2

Traci Davis
Traci Davis
7 months ago
@Fred Freddy You're a US government stooge.

3

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
7 months ago
@Traci Davis LOL Nuh, uh. Assange is a stooge for Russia.

mcwolfus 1
mcwolfus 1
7 months ago
@Traci Davis thats fine, but not sure what that has to do with mr a.

Photoshopuzr
Photoshopuzr
7 months ago
Agreed 100

Mars Upial
Mars Upial
5 months ago (edited)
David Edwards You never got to see the Swedish authorities publicly announced that JA is not guilty of any crime, did you? What do you think of the British court pretending to imprison JA for not attending a bail hearing, even though that court had never charged him of a crime? (Which is unlawful to do on behalf of a foreign country which dropped the charges). You obviously think powerful people - whether they are mass murderers like Hillary Clinton trying desperately to cover up incriminating emails, or Iraqui war criminals - are more entitled to respect than those who expose crimes against humanity. That's because you've lived under globalists authority for so long you're quite happy to let them do your thinking for you. You plainly don't have a clue how to do it yourself

4

Jack Connors
Jack Connors
4 months ago
Jiyan, DITTO, THE MANS A FREAKING GENIUS! AND WE WONDER WHY SO MANY CROOKED POLITICIANS ARE AFRAID OF HIM,, (HEY HILLARY, HES COMING FOR YOU AND OBUMMMERR!!!!!) YOU 2 WILL MAKE GREAT CELL MATES!

1

Jack Connors
Jack Connors
4 months ago
@Jiyan YOU NAILED THAT ONE ON THE HEAD! THANK YOU, JACK

Jack Connors
Jack Connors
4 months ago
@Thomas Lightningbolt AGREED 100000000000% PERFECTLY SAID!!!!!

Snezana Zivaljevic
Snezana Zivaljevic
4 months ago
He's a modern hero, I think we have more to do, not only a word's ...tragedy of what they to do him!!! Shame of humanity!!!

3

Nanc McDougall
Nanc McDougall
3 months ago
@Jiyan they stopped those false charges.

3

Nanc McDougall
Nanc McDougall
3 months ago
@PJ JP Trump is a hypocrite; watch Trump in this video:

1

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
Why did Assange help Trump and Russia? Was it a hatred of Clinton? Anyone know?

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 months ago
...but then he became a Russian stooge and sought to saddle us with Trump and Russian influence. How the mighty fall.

Isabelle Simone Deliener
Isabelle Simone Deliener
1 month ago
Jiyan Direct Live Assange now: youtube.com/watch?v=WOgUMjoFSXk

1

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
@Fred Freddy ​Hahahah! Russia! :'D The alibi of the unimaginative. Anyway, your proof? Wikileaks is the only journalist platform that has NEVER retracted any publication. You can research for us if that's true. However, since you don't seem to know how to research, follow them on Twitter to find out what they're STILL doing ;') easy-peasy.
That is despite their founder/leader being imprisoned and tortured.
In that regard, prove to us that he's not being tortured, and that the current treatment of Assange is NOT illegal. Prove those things to to us ;')

1

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
@Fred Freddy ​ Assange DID NOT hack the U.S. His sources may have.
What about the Afghanistan papers? Why isn't anyone in the Washington Post being charged with espionage?
How about the Panama Papers, anyone charged for that?
What about all the international illegal escapades of the U.S.?
They have military bases around the world. Are those legal?
Violating international airspace and bombing countries without Congress' approval? Legal?
Bombing countries at all that has NOT threatened the U.S. security? Legal?
Funding, training, supporting terrorists and rebels for proxy wars? Legal?
Military testing bioweapons on American citizens! Legal?
https://www.businessinsider.com/military-government-secret-experiments-biological-chemical-weapons-2016-9
Monstanto.. Legal?
//

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
3 weeks ago
@Shadoufang Hello,

U: "Anyway, your proof? "

See the indictments against 12 GRU military intelligence officers. They are public record.

Assange was never tortured, but he is in jail right now.

We don't need to prove Assange isn't being tortured. You made the claim with no evidence. There are no reports of Assange being tortured.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
3 weeks ago
@Fred Freddy btw, Wikileaks also published leaks on Russia.
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:Russia
//
https://wikileaks.org/spyfiles/russia/

F C
F C
4 days ago
@mcwolfus 1 you have no idea how the people commenting live. Get over yourself

mcwolfus 1
mcwolfus 1
4 days ago
@F C !?

mrebholz
mrebholz
8 hours ago
@David Edwards
NSA Troll.

mrebholz
mrebholz
7 hours ago
@Fred Freddy
Alternative Facts.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
2 hours ago
@Shadoufang No one said Assange "hacked the US". The words are there in my post. All you have to do is read them.

Assange is facing charges for conspiracy to hack into an NSA computer network.

Do you understand these words?

If so, we can move to the next part. If not, I will clarify.

Fred Freddy
Fred Freddy
1 hour ago
@mrebholz Just an fyi, "alternative facts" is a definition provided by trump's emotional support animal, Kellyanne Conway to excuse trump's lies.

An outright lie is called an "alternative fact" when it makes trump happy.

Conversely, when the truth makes trump unhappy, his cult refer to the posit as "fake news".

If you found something false, you would have said what it was and wouldn't have used a trumpian magic phrase.

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
37 minutes ago (edited)
​@Fred Freddy

"See the indictments against 12 GRU military intelligence officers. They are public record.
"
how is that related to: "...but then he became a Russian stooge and sought to saddle us with Trump and Russian influence. "

AND speaking of indicting anyone for horrific acts, any indictment on Israel or Israelis and its meddling in American affairs? :')
Remember 9/11? wink wink Wow. Indictable.

//
You can't handle the truth ;')

Shadoufang
Shadoufang
5 minutes ago (edited)
​@Fred Freddy
"conspiracy to hack" eh?
Well, why is no one from The Guardian, Spiegel, The New York Post in prison with Julian Assange for the same charges? ;')

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8043771/The-Guardian-published-unredacted-Wikileaks-cables-not-Julian-Assange-lawyer-tells-court.html
//
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/02/25/technology/25reuters-britain-assange.html
//
Because... because..?

Tell us. Come on!
"Conspiracy to hack"
pfhhhshhhs!
Julian Assange PROTECTED people, but The Guardian published names unredacted! OR published access to unredacted files!

The New York Times lied about Wikileaks releasing materials, too!
//
Who are you gonna trust?!
Your media and your government?
Or Julian Assange?
//
btw, to refresh your memory,
indict this:
'One of the Largest Human Experiments in History' Was Conducted On San Francisco (by the U.S. gov)