In my opinion, AI is currently causing significant damage to Steemit. People want to earn rewards, but they don't always want to put in the effort. For many, using AI is a huge temptation.
Steemit could profitably stand out from other sites. Here could be a Klondike of human creativity for humans. Instead, I observe the appearance of more and more posts written by AI. It's a pity, but this cannot always be clearly proven.
I believe that generating a text for participation in the contest is unacceptable. This is an insult to the author of the contest, for which the participant does not even want to pay minimal attention.
Thank you for your feedback!
Gosh, AI is such a broad term and utility. We can't simply label it as "bad" or "notorious." We've had plenty of debates in the past about how to use it effectively. Tools like Grammarly are also forms of AI, as is Microsoft Bing's image generation, which I personally find fun.
However, there's a very fine line, very fine line, and many people don't know when to stop taking advantage of AI. Using it excessively for posts often results in content that's boring and, frankly, outright off-putting.
0.00 SBD,
4.89 STEEM,
4.89 SP
Yes, at the moment, the most threatening for our platform is precisely the generation of text with the help of AI. Heartless and often meaningless text that is not intended to be read, evoke emotions, form one's opinion and interact with people. 🙁
0.00 SBD,
0.11 STEEM,
0.11 SP
In fact, AI has caused great damage to the Steemit platform. When checking articles, several tools have to be used to perform AI detection. Sometimes, even the results obtained from each detector are different.
0.00 SBD,
0.07 STEEM,
0.07 SP
You are right. Unfortunately, AI detection tools are very imperfect. I had the same problem when I was a curator.