The question is very multifaceted. Not having only one interpretation of the answer. You need to understand what constitutes quality content. I absolutely agree that the structure and structure of the platform are far from perfect. But you should first understand one thing - how the main owners see the further development of the platform. For some people, really deeply developed, scientifically based, meaningful material is required, for others, and this is the overwhelming number of participants, it is interesting to talk about how the garden was loosened and what grew there. And this is also valuable, there is a paradox in this, but it is true. We are different, but we are the same. People are looking for different things here, and what is most beautiful, they find them, or go away. Of course, it is possible to make the platform better, but I can imagine what colossal financial and time resources are needed for this. We can shout and offer something), but without knowing the development strategy, this will come down to the next post and payments). In fact, there is a decision to add, or separate, virtual spaces, or metaverses, with certain themes, purposes and meaning, and most importantly - ease of use. This is a gigantic topic, you can write and argue endlessly)