You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Objective of Steem Alliance community at a glance.

in Steem Alliance2 years ago

Well, I have read previous publications by @rme where he deals with the subject you mention here, I think that for steemit to grow again, the same example that was given in 2017 and 2018 should be copied, where investors and bid bots were what They controlled the monopoly. This does not sound like a good idea but in reality these bots called many investors who spent large amounts of money paying for their posts to be in the trending zone. When the bots came out, the price of steem skyrocketed, reaching more than 7 dollars per steem. Then @tipu came out who offered another method of receiving votes by delegation without having to pay anything and it is the method that is currently being used.

With the new management change, many investors left since the idea of the steemit team was to have a bot-free platform, which for many was an excellent idea, but the platform fell apart a bit after that. That was where the steemcurator was born who was looking for a solution to the lack of support for communities that were in decline.

I think to be successful again!! I repeat it again, you have to copy the same example from the past, you have to start giving delegations to the main curators of each community for a long time so that these communities, after the end of their period with the delegation granted, have their own steempower so that it continues to function and the community does not decline as it usually happens today. When a community stops receiving the support of the steemcurator and the booming project, it automatically decays. something that did not happen in the past.

Sort:  

¡¡Creo que volveré a tener éxito!! Lo vuelvo a repetir, hay que copiar el mismo ejemplo del pasado, hay que ir dando delegaciones a los curadores principales de cada comunidad por mucho tiempo para que estas comunidades, luego de terminar su periodo con la delegación otorgada, tengan su propio steempower para que siga funcionando y la comunidad no decaiga como suele pasar hoy en día. Cuando una comunidad deja de recibir el apoyo del steemcurator y el proyecto en auge, automáticamente decae. algo que no sucedió en el pasado.

Comparto ese método de apoyo para las comunidades, es muy díficil que una comunidad se haga poderosa sin el apoyo directo de steemcurator. Solo con un apoyo de Booming no crecerán como se debe crecer. Pero si reciben esa delegación, el apoyo puede ser más grande para sus autores y más atractivo para los recién llegados, esto haría que se sientan bastante motivados.

1_20210401_152726_0000.png

Well, you are from my same generation on Steemit, unfortunately I lost my previous account, but that is another story.

Previously, Ned Scott used to delegate Steempower to communities or projects over a long period of time. When he saw that the main healer of the community that he was the one receiving the delegation already had enough steempower obtained from the daily healing rewards, he used to withdraw the delegated steempower and give it to another community.

Now, the new steemit team does the opposite, they lend the steemcurator and the booming so that the community can do the work for them, but this loan does not last more than two months, fine. Now what does the community do after the support of the steemcurator is removed, nothing, since the main curator of that community will not have the necessary steempower for users to continue publishing there, with that the community goes downhill until it gets back support .

 2 years ago 

Thank you for your nice feedback. Actually we are also working to bring Steemit back to its previous form. One more idea we all need to come out of. That is, it can't be ended by power down after getting votes. because power works for a long time. Because, if everyone here only thinks about themselves, then no one will benefit. If everyone works together, everyone will benefit.

Yes beautiful. I agree that stopping the Power Down that would prevent more liquid from the platform from leaving, but when this happens it is because users have the intention of abandoning Steemit. either for lack of support. They do not have time to publish or are multicuentas.

When I turn off my previous account, it was because I decided to stop publishing and lasting two years inactive when I wanted to return I had lost my keys. So I had to open this new account .. The moral is that when users decide to turn off it is because they have the intensibility of abandoning that account and leaving.