RE: Booming Upvotes - Hypocrisy?
In my opinion, there are 3 scenarios that arise around the administration of Booming: 1) The administrators are aware of the votes given to the users to avoid falling into unequal support, 2) The administrators are not interested How many votes have the users to whom they intend to give the vote accumulated, ignoring the program guidelines. and 3) Administrators are aware of abuses in the distribution of Booming votes towards one or more users or communities.
- Unfortunately, administrators have been discovered abusing the Booming program for their own interests, and this affects the entire ecosystem.
I rarely read something good on Steemit and I read a lot, aweful lot for about 12+ hours per day no matter if I am an SC or not.
I can say that each one has a point of view on each topic and/or each situation, therefore, we should not get carried away by the criteria of others, if you do not like a poem, a drawing or a story, it does not mean I shouldn't like it either.
19 posts and 8x a winner? I am so curious about that name. This must be the best writer of all unless no one else joined.
22 communities with booming votes and joining 19 out of 22 with a nearly 50% chance to win...
Considering the options you gave (and the fact there is even a word for it) it is known.
🍀♥️
There is another similar case, which I reported at the time.
https://steemit.com/hive-193637/@adeljose/skkt56
@wakeupkitty
Thank you. This name is no surprise. I asked about him today why the vote was given.